Barton's pendulum, phase relationship

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the phase relationship observed in Barton's pendulum, particularly how different lengths of pendula exhibit varying phase shifts relative to a driver pendulum. Participants explore the theoretical and mathematical underpinnings of these observations, as well as analogies to electrical resonators.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the phase relationship is 0 for shorter pendula, 1/4 cycle for the pendulum in resonance, and anti-phase for longer pendula relative to the driver pendulum.
  • Another participant suggests Hyperphysics as a resource, mentioning the relationship between phase difference and natural frequency in oscillators, specifically highlighting a 90° phase difference at resonance.
  • A participant describes the complexity of Barton's Pendulum, emphasizing that it involves coupled pendulums with different frequencies rather than a single driving frequency.
  • There is a discussion about the analogy between mechanical and electrical resonators, with one participant comparing the behavior of a mass-spring system to an LCR circuit.
  • Another participant clarifies that the middle pendulum, which has a heavier mass, acts as the driver while the lighter pendulums are driven.
  • Concerns are raised about the intuitiveness of electrical concepts like impedance and reactance compared to mechanical systems.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various viewpoints on the phase relationships and the underlying mechanics of Barton's Pendulum. There is no consensus on a single model or explanation, and multiple interpretations of the phase relationships and their analogies exist.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the complexity of the system due to the different frequencies of the pendulums and the challenges in deriving a mathematical basis for the observed phase relationships. There are also references to assumptions made in analogies between mechanical and electrical systems.

Glenn G
Messages
113
Reaction score
12
Hi community,
The phase relationship is 0 for the shorter pendulae, 1/4 cycle for the pendulum in resonance and in anti-phase for the longer pendulae; relative to the driver pendulum.
I have observed this but I can see it conceptually to an extent but wondered if anyone knows of a resource for the mathematical basis of this. I've tried to search for it but to no avail.
Would really appreciate any help.
regards,
G
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hyperphysics is often a good source of information like this. This link shows the result without too much of the derivation for a mass spring oscillation. It starts with the equation of motion and shows the solution in terms of the transient solution and the steady state solution which is how things settle down. The transient part (with e-γt) dies away and leaves you with a fairly simple expression for Amplitude and Phase.
If you look at the expression for phase, you see when k=mω2, the phase difference is 90° and it is on one side or the other, depending which of the two is greater.
Is that sufficient?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Glenn G
Thanks, quite involved but I get it.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
There's a reasonably intuitive way of thinking about the phase of a driven oscillator (mass on spring). When the natural frequency is equal to the driving frequency, there is a 90° phase difference between the two oscillations. If the mass is lighter, its motion will 'follow' the driving frequency easier so you can look at the phase shift as being less. If the mass is greater then it will lag behind because it never quite makes it to the 90° phase point.
Of course, Barton's Pendulum is one stage harder than this because the pendulums all have different frequencies (there's not a particular 'driving' frequency. The shorter ones will be racing ahead of the rest and the longer ones will be lagging behind. It's a case of Coupled Pendulums, rather than Driven Pendulums.
 
Glenn G said:
Hi community,
The phase relationship is 0 for the shorter pendulae, 1/4 cycle for the pendulum in resonance and in anti-phase for the longer pendulae; relative to the driver pendulum.
I have observed this but I can see it conceptually to an extent but wondered if anyone knows of a resource for the mathematical basis of this. I've tried to search for it but to no avail.
Would really appreciate any help.
regards,
G
I have tried to illustrate the similarities between mechanical and electrical resonators. It might make it easier. The electrical circuit is an LCR series circuit and for the mechanical system I have assumed a spring and a mass. In both cases the drive power is kept the same as frequency is varied. All the drive power is absorbed in friction (mechanical) or resistance (electrical) once steady state conditions are reached. These are only analogies and other comparisons are possible.
upload_2018-11-25_19-53-34.png
 

Attachments

  • upload_2018-11-25_19-53-34.png
    upload_2018-11-25_19-53-34.png
    22.5 KB · Views: 903
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur
sophiecentaur said:
There's a reasonably intuitive way of thinking about the phase of a driven oscillator (mass on spring). When the natural frequency is equal to the driving frequency, there is a 90° phase difference between the two oscillations. If the mass is lighter, its motion will 'follow' the driving frequency easier so you can look at the phase shift as being less. If the mass is greater then it will lag behind because it never quite makes it to the 90° phase point.
Of course, Barton's Pendulum is one stage harder than this because the pendulums all have different frequencies (there's not a particular 'driving' frequency. The shorter ones will be racing ahead of the rest and the longer ones will be lagging behind. It's a case of Coupled Pendulums, rather than Driven Pendulums.
Actually, that's not quite right. The middle pendulum has a heavy mass on it and the others are light. The middle pendulum can be regarded as the 'driver' and the others as 'driven'.
tech99 said:
I have tried to illustrate the similarities between mechanical and electrical resonators. It might make it easier.
I agree that the Maths may be easier (more familiar) perhaps for someone happy with EE but it is much easier to produce a row of coupled pendulums than a row of coupled electrical oscillators. The concepts of Electrical Impedance and Reactance are things that we EE's took in with our Mother's milk but I do wonder about how 'intuitive' those concepts are. The left hand side of your table would actually be enough, I feel. (It's nicely put, too)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
9K
Replies
82
Views
10K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
506K