Basic Heisenberg uncertainty principle stuff

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the Heisenberg uncertainty principle, specifically applied to a scenario involving a bullet shot from a rifle. Participants explore the relationship between the uncertainty in position and the corresponding uncertainty in momentum, as well as the implications for accuracy when aiming at a target.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of the uncertainty in position being perpendicular to the bullet's motion and question how this affects the momentum uncertainty. There is also consideration of whether to treat the uncertainty as an equality or inequality in calculations. Additionally, questions arise regarding how to calculate the potential miss distance from a target based on the uncertainty in position.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the application of the uncertainty principle in multiple dimensions and the nature of momentum as a vector quantity. There is an ongoing exploration of how to approach the calculations without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention the need for accuracy in measurements and the potential for assumptions about the direction of the bullet's motion. There is an acknowledgment of the original poster's recent exposure to quantum mechanics concepts, which may influence their understanding of the topic.

rtsswmdktbmhw
Messages
38
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


A bullet is shot from a rifle.

1) if the position of the centre of mass of the bullet perpendicular to its motion is known to have an accuracy of 0.01 cm, what is the corresponding uncertainty in its momentum?

2) If the accuracy of the bullet were determined only by the uncertainty principle, by how much might the centre of the bullet miss a pinpoint target 300 m away?

Homework Equations


##\Delta x \Delta p_{x}\geq\frac{\bar h}{2}## (or ##\Delta x \Delta p_{x}\approx\frac{\bar h}{2}##?)

The Attempt at a Solution


1) If the uncertainty is perpendicular to the motion, then can't we have 0 uncertainty? But the question asks for 'corresponding uncertainty' so it sounds like I'm supposed to get some answer. I'm not sure whether to plug into the equation and get a number. But that doesn't sound right because then I would be getting ##\Delta p_{y}## if using 0.01 cm, right?

2) Since the position of the bullet has an uncertainty of 0.01 cm, would this simply be how much the centre of the bullet might miss the pinpoint target?

Sorry if there is anything obvious or simple. I have just done what seems like a crash course on introductory QM in the past week or two. Things might not have clicked properly yet...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
##\Delta x \Delta p_{x}\geq\frac{\hbar}{2}## (or ##\Delta x \Delta p_{x}\approx\frac{\hbar}{2}##?)

(tip: in LaTeX, use "\hbar" for ##\hbar##.)

That's just along the x direction. There are exactly similar equations for the y and z directions: ##\Delta y \Delta p_y \geq\frac{\hbar}{2}## and ##\Delta z \Delta p_z \geq\frac{\hbar}{2}## Remember momentum is a vector quantity, with x, y and z components.

If you assume the gun is aimed along the x direction, then you can use either y or z for the perpendicular direction.

1) if the position of the centre of mass of the bullet perpendicular to its motion is known to have an accuracy of 0.01 cm, what is the corresponding uncertainty in its momentum?

Here the "corresponding uncertainty in its momentum" refers to the component pependicular to the direction that the gun is aimed.
 
Oh, okay, so I should be finding the y component uncertainty. So it's simple plug and chug with the equation? Is it correct to replace the inequality with the approximately equal sign, or should I be leaving it as an inequality?

For question 2, then, is it a matter of finding y component velocity using p=mv, then simply finding the maximum inaccuracy (deviation from pinpoint target) at 300 m using dist=vel*time?
 
Right on both counts. Strictly speaking it should be kept as an uncertainty, although most of the time we're just interested in the order of magnitude (power of ten), so lots of times people use the "approximately equals." The actual uncertainty is likely to be somewhat bigger than what ##\hbar/2## gives, but not as much as ten times bigger.
 
Okay, thanks for your explanations! And also for the tip for ##\hbar##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
530
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K