Basic PDE Help: Simplifying the Confusing Concepts | MathBin

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jomomma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Pde
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around solving a partial differential equation (PDE) of the form \( x\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+2y\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial z} = 3u \). Participants are exploring methods for simplifying and solving this equation, particularly through the method of characteristics.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about how to approach the PDE and seeks assistance.
  • Another participant questions the initial approach taken and asks for clarification on what has been attempted, specifically regarding the characteristics method.
  • A participant shares their work on the characteristics equations, detailing the relationships derived for \( x, y, z, \) and \( u \) over time.
  • There is a proposal for a potential solution in the form \( u(x,y,z)=\varphi(xe^{-z},ye^{-2z})e^{3z} \), but it is presented as a question for verification.
  • Another participant suggests verifying the proposed solution by substituting it back into the original PDE.
  • A participant acknowledges they can check the solution but seeks confirmation from others to ensure completeness and correctness.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the correctness of the proposed solution, and there is ongoing uncertainty regarding the completeness of the approach and the potential for errors in the calculations.

Contextual Notes

The discussion includes various assumptions about the characteristics method and the handling of the \( u_z \) term, which remain unresolved. There is also a lack of clarity on whether all possible solutions have been considered.

jomomma
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
http://mathbin.net/906

cant figure this one out
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

jomomma said:
x\frac{\partial u}{\partial x}+2y\frac{\partial u}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial u}{\partial z} = 3u

cant figure this one out

Hi jomomma! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(type "tex" instead of "EQ" on this forum :wink:)

What have you tried?:smile:
 
What do you mean by "figure this out"? Did you stare at it expecting the answer to suddenly pop into your head or did you DO something like writing down the equations of the characteristics?

If the latter, please show us what you did!
 
I tried doing characteristics but i am getting confused with the u_z term. Heres what i do

<br /> <br /> \[<br /> \frac{dx}{dt}&amp;=&amp;x\Rightarrow x=x_0e^t<br /> \]<br /> \[<br /> \frac{dy}{dt}&amp;=&amp;2y\Rightarrow y=y_0e^2t<br /> \]<br /> \[<br /> \frac{dz}{dt}&amp;=&amp;1\Rightarrow z=z_0 + t<br /> \]<br /> \[<br /> \frac{du}{dt}&amp;=&amp;3u\Rightarrow u=u_0e^3t<br /> \]<br /> <br />

from there i try to put y and x into the equation for u

<br /> u=xy=x_0y_0e^3t<br />

what do i do with z and \varphi(x,y)
 
Last edited:
could someone verify whether the correct answer is

<br /> <br /> u(x,y,z)=\varphi(xe^{-z},ye^{-2z})e^{3z}<br /> <br />
 
Can't you plug it in and check like you would with any DE?
 
yes, i can and i have, but i wanted third party confirmation, because i may not have included all solutions or may have made a mistake
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K