Basic QM: Probability Density w/ 3 Slits Open

  • Thread starter Thread starter phosgene
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a quantum mechanics problem involving probability density functions for particles passing through multiple slits. The original poster presents a scenario with three slits and asks how to express the probability density for detecting particles on a screen under different conditions, including classical physics comparisons.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the mathematical formulation of probability density functions for different configurations of slits. Questions arise about the ability to express the combined probability density in terms of individual probabilities from single slits.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the differences between quantum and classical approaches to probability density. There is ongoing exploration of how interference effects in quantum mechanics complicate the expression of total probability density compared to classical physics.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of interference in quantum mechanics and how it contrasts with classical interpretations. The discussion also reflects on the limitations of expressing combined probabilities based solely on individual slit probabilities.

phosgene
Messages
145
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Suppose that we have a source of particles (e.g. photons) S, then three slits labelled 1,2 and 3, followed by a screen. For a particle that has passed through slit i, where i=1,2,3, let ψi(x) be the amplitude for the particle arriving at a position x units along the screen.

(a) Write down the probability density function for detecting a particle at a position x on the screen when:

1. all three slits are open,
2. slits 1 and 3 are open,

[Note: you don't need to determine explicit expressions for the amplitudes ψi(x)]

(b) If we applied purely classical physics, how would your answers to the above differ?

(c) Suppose we know the probability density functions for detecting the particle at a position x when only one particular slit is open. That is, we know P1(x), P2(x) and P3(x). Are we able to express the probability density function for the case of all three slits open in terms of P1(x), P2(x) and P3(x)? Can we do this if we apply purely classical physics?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



(a) |ψslits 1,2,3|2= (ψ*slit 1 + ψ*slit 2 + ψ*slit 3)(ψslit 1 + ψslit 2 + ψslit 3)

= |ψslit 1|2 + |ψslit 2|2 + |ψslit 3|2 + ψ*slit 1ψslit 2 + ψ*slit 1ψslit 3 + ψ*slit 2ψslit 1 + ψ*slit 2ψslit 3 + ψ*slit 3ψslit 1 + ψ*slit 3ψslit 2

(b) The probability density functions would add linearly in classical physics, giving:

slits 1,2,3|2= |ψslits 1|2 + |ψslits 2|2 + |ψslits 3|2

(c) Well I would just plug the values for P(x) into the above equations for QM and classical physics, respectively, right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For part (c): Is it possible to express P(x) in terms of just P1(x), P2(x), and P3(x)?
 
Maybe not, because those probabilities don't take into account that the electron could interfere with itself. But it is possible in classical physics because the electron is just a particle.
 
phosgene said:
Maybe not, ...

You should be able to give a definite answer by looking at your mathematical expression for the answer to (a). How would you write P1(x) in terms of ψslit 1, etc.?
 
P1(x) could be written as ψ*slit 1ψslit 1, but my expression of the probability in a) includes terms like ψ*slit 1ψslit 3 which cannot be expressed in terms of P1(x), P2(x) or P3(x). Therefore I cannot express the probability in terms of just P1(x), P2(x) and P3(x). But in classical physics, the probability density functions add linearly, so I could express the probability in terms of P1(x), P2(x) and P3(x).
 
Yes, I think that's what the question wanted.
 
Great, thanks! :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 61 ·
3
Replies
61
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K