Basis and Dimension of a Subpace.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hiche
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Basis Dimension
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves determining the basis and dimension of a subspace defined by a condition on the derivatives of polynomials in the space of cubic polynomials, P3. The specific condition is that the sum of the derivatives at two points equals zero.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to find the first derivative of a general cubic polynomial and evaluates it at specific points to derive a relationship between coefficients. They question whether their identified basis and dimension are correct. Other participants confirm the reasoning and clarify the implications of the derived condition on the polynomial coefficients.

Discussion Status

The discussion has progressed with participants confirming the original poster's findings regarding the basis and dimension of the subspace. There is also a discussion about the conditions for a linear transformation to be one-to-one, with some participants providing insights into the relationship between the nullspace and injectivity.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working within the framework of polynomial spaces and linear transformations, with an emphasis on understanding the implications of derivative conditions on polynomial forms. There is an acknowledgment of the field in which the polynomials are defined, though specifics are not detailed.

Hiche
Messages
82
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



V = {p(x) belongs to P3 such that p'(1) + p'(-1) = 0}

Homework Equations



...

The Attempt at a Solution



Okay, so finding the first derivative of p(x) = ax^3 + bx^2 + cx + d and plugging in the values 1 and -1 (to find p'(1) and p'(-1)), we get c = -3a. Does this make the basis of V = {x^3 - 3x, x^2, 1}. And the dimension hence is 3? I'm fairly new to the subject.

Also, when wanting to prove a transformation is one-to-one, does finding that the nullspace of T = {0} (i.e, the homogenous system has only one trivial solution which is 0) suffice?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You are exactly correct: Indeed, we can think of [itex]1,x,x^2,x^3[/itex] as basis vectors, and the requirement on V is that c=-3a as you have shown. Hence
[tex]V = \{ ax^3 + bx^2 -3ax + d: a,b,d \in F \}[/tex]
where F is whatever field in which you are working. Thus there are only three free parameters, so V is three dimensional. You already gave an explicit basis, so everything is fine there.

You are also correct about showing one-to-one ness: one need only show that the nullspace is trivial. Indeed, having trivial kernel and being injective are equivalent for linear operators on vector spaces.

Let [itex]T: V \to W[/itex] be a linear map on vector spaces V and W. Suppose first that T is injective and let [itex]x \in \ker T[/itex] so that Tx=0. But T0 = 0 so we have that [itex]Tx = T0[/itex] and by injectivity this implies that x = 0. Thus the kernel is always trivial.

Conversely, assume that the kernel is always trivial and consider Tx=Ty. Since the function is linear, we must have that Tx-Ty = T(x-y) = 0 so that [itex]x-y \in \ker T[/itex]. Since the kernel is trivial, this means that x-y=0, so in particular x=y. Thus the map is injective.
 
That's extremely helpful. Thank you for the reply, Kreizhn.
 
A (very slightly) different way of looking at it is that the condition f'(1)+ f'(-1)= 0 leads to, as you say, c= -3a and so any such polynomial may be written [itex]ax^3+ bx^3+ cx+ d= ax^3+ bx^2- 3ax+ d[/itex][itex]a(x^3- 3x)+ bx^2+ d[/itex] so that any such polynomial can be written as a linear combination of [itex]x^3- 3x[/itex], [itex]x^2[/itex] and [itex]1[/itex]. Those are the "basis vectors".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K