Beat frequency and length question. (grade 11)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion revolves around calculating the lengths of two identical closed-end pipes producing beat frequencies. Given one pipe produces a note at 10Hz and the other at 30Hz, the calculated wavelengths are 34.04 meters and 11.35 meters, respectively. The lengths of the pipes are derived from the harmonic equations, leading to multiple solutions for integer harmonics, such as n1=1 and n2=2, yielding a length of 8.51 meters. The conversation highlights the complexity of resonance in larger pipes and the potential for infinite combinations of harmonics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of beat frequency and its calculation
  • Familiarity with harmonic equations for closed pipes
  • Knowledge of wave properties including wavelength and frequency
  • Basic algebra for solving equations with multiple variables
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the relationship between frequency and wavelength in sound waves
  • Learn about the harmonic series in closed pipes
  • Explore the concept of resonance in musical instruments
  • Investigate the effects of temperature on the speed of sound
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on wave mechanics and sound, as well as educators looking for practical examples of harmonic theory in closed pipes.

Ethan_Tab
Messages
57
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Two pipes, Identical in length and closed at one end are producing notes. You are very, very annoyed because the notes are creating an audible beat frequency of 20Hz. If one pipe is producing a note at 10Hz and the temperature is 15C (which correlates to a speed of sound of 340.39m/s), what is the length of the two pipes?

Homework Equations



Beat frequency= abs(ƒ_2-ƒ_1)
L(n)=[(2n-1)/4]λ --- (length as a function of the harmonic)
v=λƒ
v(t)=331.4+0.606T --- (velocity as a function of temperature)
T=1/f --- where T= period

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
Since we can't have negative beat frequencies we know that the second pipe is creating a 30Hz sound.
λ_2=340.39/30=11.35meters (second pipe)
and
λ_1=340.39/10=34.04 meters (first pipe)

We also know that for a closed pipe, the closed end must have a node while the open end must have an antinode. But since we don't know the harmonic, there's not much we can do with that information.

Any ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You missed the bit of info saying the pipes are equal in length ?
 
BvU said:
You missed the bit of info saying the pipes are equal in length ?

Im not too sure I understand what you mean.
 
Well, you have the wavelengths in both pipes and you have the fact that the lengths of the pipes themselves are equal.
 
BvU said:
Well, you have the wavelengths in both pipes and you have the fact that the lengths of the pipes themselves are equal.

So if I'm understanding you correctly, you're saying to set the two equation L(n)=[(2n-1)/4]λ_1 and L(n)=[(2n-1)/4]λ_2 equal
[(2n-1)/4]34.04=[(2n-1)/4]11.35
We can solve for the n and in this case
n=0.5

Is that what you mean?
 
Very close, but no: first of all you need to find an integer number n. In fact you need to find two integer numbers, one for each pipe.
And it becomes easier if for the 34.04 you write ##\lambda_1## and for the other ##\lambda_2 = \lambda_1/3## !
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ethan_Tab
Yet another eureka moment eh ? :smile: !

[edit] premature !
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ethan_Tab
BvU said:
Very close, but no: first of all you need to find an integer number n. In fact you need to find two integer numbers, one for each pipe.
And it becomes easier if for the 34.04 you write ##\lambda_1## and for the other ##\lambda_2 = \lambda_1/3## !

Okay so doing that, another system of equation:

λ(2n-1)/4=L
and
λ(2n-1)/12=L

solving for n in equation 1:
n=4L/2λ+1
Putting that into equation 2:
[λ(2(4L/2λ+1)-1]/12
which simplifies into
4L/12=L

Now what?
 
You need two n. ##n_1## for pipe 1 and ##n_2## for pipe 2. That way
[(2n-1)/4]34.04=[(2n-1)/4]11.35
becomes$$
\lambda_1 {2n_1-1\over 4} = \lambda_1 {2n_2-1\over 12}$$
 
  • #10
BvU said:
You need two n. ##n_1## for pipe 1 and ##n_2## for pipe 2. That way becomes$$
\lambda_1 {2n_1-1\over 4} = \lambda_1 {2n_2-1\over 12}$$

Im confused as to what I need to solve for.
Also, how would I solve for either n_1 or n_2 given that there is only one equation?
 
  • #11
There is one equation. Same as with the other guy, ##\lambda_1## divides out. You are left with one equation and two unknowns. Disaster ? No ! You also know that both are natural numbers.
 
  • #12
BvU said:
There is one equation. Same as with the other guy, ##\lambda_1## divides out. You are left with one equation and two unknowns. Disaster ? No ! You also know that both are natural numbers.

I understand why the two n's must be natural. I don't understand however, how I can solve for either one algebraically given that there is only one equation.
 
  • #13
Work out the equation (eliminate the ##\lambda_1## and the factor 4) to its simplest form and see what you get -- in particular, consider which combinations ##n_1 , n_2## satisfy the equation. Then consider what pipe length goes with such solutions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ethan_Tab
  • #14
BvU said:
Work out the equation (eliminate the ##\lambda_1## and the factor 4) to its simplest form and see what you get -- in particular, consider which combinations ##n_1 , n_2## satisfy the equation. Then consider what pipe length goes with such solutions.

Using guess and check I can see that n_1= 1 when n_2=2

there's the eureka moment!

If we use the λ2n-1/4 with the sets [n_1 and λ_1 or n_2 and λ_2] We get the same (presumably correct) answer of 8.51 meters!

Thanks for the help and patience BvU!
 
  • #15
Not done yet: what about higher numbers than 1 and 2 ?
 
  • #16
BvU said:
Not done yet: what about higher numbers than 1 and 2 ?

Well, n_1=3 and n_2=8 also works

so using these numbers to find the new length I get: 42.55 meters.
 
  • #17
It appears that there is more then one solution? as there are quite a lot (if not an infinite amount) of possible "n" combinations.
 
  • #18
Yes, and in between there is ##n_1 =2,\ n_2 = 5##.

My impression is that 8.5 m is already pretty big for a pipe, so you're safe assuming the lowest possible combination is what they want for an answer. But if I were teacher, I'd sure reward the students who point out that there are bigger pipes that also qualify !

In addition, it's already pretty difficult to get such a big pipe to resonate at its second resonance frequency, let alone at its fifth. But that's something the experts should sort out, and I'm just an ordinary physicist...

Well done.

@idc: it's not polite to hijack a thread and interfere this way. Constructive contributions are always welcome, though, if they help the original poster.
--
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ethan_Tab
  • #19
BvU said:
In addition, it's already pretty difficult to get such a big pipe to resonate at its second resonance frequency, let alone at its fifth. But that's something the experts should sort out, and I'm just an ordinary physicist...

Haha. Again, I appreciate your help immensely. :smile:
 
  • #20

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
30K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K
Replies
3
Views
6K