Beginner's question on Stress-strain curve

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the behavior of the stress-strain curve, specifically the decrease in slope after the yield point. It clarifies the distinction between engineering stress-strain curves and true stress-strain curves. In engineering curves, the assumption of constant area leads to an apparent dip in stress values during necking, while true curves reflect continuous rise until failure by using instantaneous cross-sectional area. The conversation also highlights that beyond the yield point, less force is required to deform materials due to weaker intermolecular forces.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of stress and strain concepts in materials science
  • Familiarity with engineering stress-strain curves versus true stress-strain curves
  • Knowledge of necking phenomena in material deformation
  • Basic grasp of intermolecular forces affecting material properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the differences between engineering stress-strain curves and true stress-strain curves in detail
  • Explore the concept of necking and its implications on material strength
  • Investigate the role of intermolecular forces in material deformation
  • Learn about the significance of Poisson's ratio in stress-strain analysis
USEFUL FOR

Materials scientists, mechanical engineers, and students studying material mechanics who seek to deepen their understanding of stress-strain behavior in materials.

kelvin490
Gold Member
Messages
227
Reaction score
3


Why the slope of typical stress-strain curve decreases after yielding? If it is strain-hardening, why less stress is required to further increase the strain compared to that before yielding?

All replies are much welcome, thank you.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
ok, you have to know the difference between engineering stress-strain curve and true stress-strain curve.

to begin with E = stress/strain, and stress = F/Area,

In engineering curve, you assume that the initial area is constant throughout the test, as this is easier than trying to measure it dynamically. This is not true of course, due to Poisson's ratio, but it is a time saver. As a consequence, when necking begins, despite the area getting significantly smaller, you assume its the same. so the stress is calculated to be smaller than it actually is. Hence the dip.

In a true curve, you don't get this dip but instead see the curve rise continuously until it fails (snaps/breaks/whatever). This is because the instantaneous cross-sectional area is used.
 
Thank you for your reply but I still want to have some points clarified.


streeters said:
As a consequence, when necking begins, despite the area getting significantly smaller, you assume its the same. so the stress is calculated to be smaller than it actually is. Hence the dip.

I appreciate that when necking begins the area decreases significantly. However, necking mainly occurs in the latest part of loading, it seems that it is not occurs at the yield point. Then why the slope decreases a lot after yield point? Does the area also decrease significantly at the yield point so there is a sudden decrease in the slope?


streeters said:
In a true curve, you don't get this dip but instead see the curve rise continuously until it fails (snaps/breaks/whatever). This is because the instantaneous cross-sectional area is used.

I have checked for some book that for true stress-true strain curve there is still a sudden bend in the curve, why is it so?
 
Beyond the yield point less force is needed to deform the material due to weaker inter-molecular forces.
The slope of the curve decreases.
The biggest difference between the engineering and true curve is after the ultimate tensile stress.
At yield point the area is almost the same as the initial area.
 
Beyond the yield point less force is needed to deform the material due to weaker inter-molecular forces.
The slope of the curve decreases.
The biggest difference between the engineering and true curve is after the ultimate tensile stress.
At yield point the area is almost the same as the initial area.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
15K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
10K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K