Behavior of the browser's Back button.

  • Thread starter Thread starter collinsmark
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
Recent changes in browser behavior have affected how the "Back" button interacts with unread thread indicators on PF. Users have noted that after reading a thread and returning via the "Back" button, the thread name remains bold, indicating it is still unread, until the page is refreshed. This change appears to be related to updates in Firefox, as users report similar experiences across multiple devices using the same browser. In contrast, Internet Explorer retains the previous behavior, updating the thread status immediately upon returning. The discussion highlights the impact of browser updates on user experience and thread visibility.
collinsmark
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Messages
3,435
Reaction score
3,291
Behavior of the browser's "Back" button.

I've noticed some new behavior of PF as of the last two or three weeks or so.

When I look at a list of threads on PF (whether it be a list of threads in a subforum, or my own "subscribed threads"), recently updated threads that I have not read yet have their thread name displayed in boldface. After catching up on one of these threads, and clicking on the browser's "back" button, PF's behavior used to be such that the thread name in question was no longer displayed in boldface.

But now when clicking the browser's "back" button the thread name in question is still displayed in boldface. It's not until I refresh the page (or re-click on "subscribed Threads") that the displayed thread name goes to normal (un-bolded), indicating that I'm all caught up on that thread.

Given my current habits, this causes me to inadvertently re-read threads that I just finished reading moments before.

I'm guessing that maybe this behavior was intentional: Don't indicate a change relative to the user's cache when clicking the browser's "back" button in a possible attempt to reduce server load.

But I don't know if that is correct. Is this behavior intentional?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's odd, the back button never acted that way for me, it always kept the title in boldface. I tried it on this thread a second ago and it showed it as unread.

I use Chrome, what is your browser?
 
I agree w/ lisab ... this is likely to be browser behavior, not site behavior.

Edit: specifically, it's probably to do with the way your browser handles cookies
 
Thanks, you're right. It does seem to be browser related. It must have been a recent change with Firefox, which is the browser I use for most things. I noticed this behavior on several computers. But I was using Firefox on all the computers. I suppose they all might have updated to the latest version of Firefox about about the same time. So that's probably the reason.

Internet Explorer still behaves the "old way" (the way Firefox used to behave as of a few weeks ago), where hitting the "back" button automatically triggers whatever it is that's necessary to remove the boldface on the thread name that was just read.

I haven't tested Chrome yet, but I'll take your word for it Lisab.
 
I want to thank those members who interacted with me a couple of years ago in two Optics Forum threads. They were @Drakkith, @hutchphd, @Gleb1964, and @KAHR-Alpha. I had something I wanted the scientific community to know and slipped a new idea in against the rules. Thank you also to @berkeman for suggesting paths to meet with academia. Anyway, I finally got a paper on the same matter as discussed in those forum threads, the fat lens model, got it peer-reviewed, and IJRAP...
This came up in my job today (UXP). Never thought to raise it here on PF till now. Hyperlinks really should be underlined at all times. PF only underlines them when they are rolled over. Colour alone (especially dark blue/purple) makes it difficult to spot a hyperlink in a large block of text (or even a small one). Not everyone can see perfectly. Even if they don't suffer from colour deficiency, not everyone has the visual acuity to distinguish two very close shades of text. Hover actions...
About 20 years ago, in my mid-30s (and with a BA in economics and a master's in business), I started taking night classes in physics hoping to eventually earn the science degree I'd always wanted but never pursued. I found physics forums and used it to ask questions I was unable to get answered from my textbooks or class lectures. Unfortunately, work and life got in the way and I never got further the freshman courses. Well, here it is 20 years later. I'm in my mid-50s now, and in a...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
5K
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
502K
Back
Top