Bell's state measurement in the Bell basis

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the measurement of Bell states in the Bell basis, specifically questioning the nature of the measurement results and the implications for quantum superposition and entanglement. Participants explore the theoretical aspects of quantum measurement, entanglement, and the behavior of quantum states during measurement processes.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether measuring a specific Bell state results in the same Bell state or if it leads to a superposition, expressing uncertainty about the collapse of superposition during the measurement.
  • Another participant suggests that if entangled qubits are in a certain Bell state, a Bell state measurement does not change the entanglement between the qubits.
  • A different viewpoint posits that measurement typically results in the collapse of superposition, implying that the measurement process alters the state of the system.
  • One participant argues that measurement only destroys superpositions when the results correspond to states not in superposition, asserting that a Bell state measurement will force the system into a Bell state.
  • Examples of quantum circuits are provided to illustrate the measurement process and its effects on the state of the qubits, indicating that the output can be in superposition.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the effects of measurement on superposition and entanglement, indicating that there is no consensus on the implications of Bell state measurements.

Contextual Notes

Participants discuss the nature of quantum measurement, superposition, and entanglement without resolving the underlying assumptions or definitions related to these concepts.

limarodessa
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
Hi all

My question:

One of the four Bell's state are measuring in the Bell basis. Whether the result of measurement of this one of the four Bell's state will be the same Bell's state (just that Bell's state which are measuring) ? The each of four Bell's state is a quantum superposition of the two entangled qubits. Whether the result of measurement in the case of Bell basis will be superposition as well ? Whether there will not be collapse of the superposition ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So you are wondering if entangled qubits are in a certain bell-state, if you perform a bell-state measurement the entanglement between the qubits doesn't change?
 
StevieTNZ said:
So you are wondering if entangled qubits are in a certain bell-state, if you perform a bell-state measurement the entanglement between the qubits doesn't change?

Yes. In my mind the result of any quantum measurement is the collapse of superposition
 
Measurement only destroys superpositions when all the measurement results correspond to states that aren't in superposition. If the measurement results correspond to states in superposition, measurement will create superpositions.

So you have it exactly backwards. Doing a Bell state measurement won't just keep a system in a Bell state, it will force the system into a Bell state

Here is an example circuit in Quirk which demonstrates this fact:

Screenshot from 2016-07-26 19:29:21.png


At the start, the two top qubits are Off. Then they are each conditionally NOT-ed into the two ancilla qubits at the bottom, using Z-axis and then X-axis controls. This copies the Z-parity and X-parity of the two top qubits into the bottom qubits, where they can be measured. This is a Bell basis measurement. Then the circuit focuses on the measurement result where both parities were Off (the same basic thing happens in the other three cases). Notice that the two top qubits are no longer Off. In fact they are now entangled into the state ##|00\rangle + |11\rangle##.

You can also perform the measurement inline by transforming out of of the Bell basis, performing a measurement, then transforming back into the Bell basis. This makes it very obvious that the output is in superposition. (It's so obvious that I felt like it didn't address your question, which is why I did the more complicated measurement using extra qubits instead.) Here's the inline circuit:

Screenshot from 2016-07-26 19:37:37.png
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
775
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 93 ·
4
Replies
93
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
1K