What Are Berkeley Grad Students Saying About Maths Courses 202A, 205, and 214?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the experiences and opinions of Berkeley graduate students regarding three math courses: 202A, 205, and 214. Course 202A is noted as the most basic, often taken by undergraduates, while 205 is described as challenging and less enjoyable, particularly under certain instructors like Sarason, who is criticized for his grading and teaching style. In contrast, 214, which covers differential geometry and Lie groups, is presented as a standard course that may appeal to those interested in differential topology. The conversation highlights personal preferences, with some students expressing a strong dislike for the technical nature of 205, while others have found enjoyment in courses like 185. The choice between 214 and 205 is particularly relevant for undergraduates considering their options based on past interests in complex analysis and differential topology.
SeReNiTy
Messages
170
Reaction score
0
Any Berkeley grad students in maths here?

Just want to get your opinions on the following subjects,

202A
205
214

Pros and cons?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It greatly depends on who's teaching the course. Of those three 202A is the most basic. It's taken by about 50% undergraduates. My only experience with 205 is when Sarason taught it, and I did not enjoy it. It was hard, boring, and harshly graded. Unless you really like complex analysis, I wouldn't take it from him. 214 is a standard course in differnetial geometry with some Lie groups stuff. What do you actually want to know?
 
Well I'm a undergraduate student at the moment, and I was thinking of taking 2/3 of those units mentioned above. I've definitely decided on 202A and now I'm trying to decide between 214 and 205. Previously, I've enjoyed both complex analysis and differential topology.
 
Who are you? I'm an undergraduate too.

Also, I really liked 185, but hated 205. It was totally technical stuff. For instance, we spend two weeks proving a bound on one of the coefficients of the taylor expansion of a holomorphic map. That's not my cup of tea.
 
Last edited:
Bit Britain-specific but I was wondering, what's the best path to take for A-Levels out of the following (I know Y10 seems a bit early to be thinking about A-levels, but my choice will impact what I do this year/ in y11) I (almost) definitely want to do physics at University - so keep that in mind... The subjects that I'm almost definitely going to take are Maths, Further Maths and Physics, and I'm taking a fast track programme which means that I'll be taking AS computer science at the end...
After a year of thought, I decided to adjust my ratio for applying the US/EU(+UK) schools. I mostly focused on the US schools before, but things are getting complex and I found out that Europe is also a good place to study. I found some institutes that have professors with similar interests. But gaining the information is much harder than US schools (like you have to contact professors in advance etc). For your information, I have B.S. in engineering (low GPA: 3.2/4.0) in Asia - one SCI...
I graduated with a BSc in Physics in 2020. Since there were limited opportunities in my country (mostly teaching), I decided to improve my programming skills and began working in IT, first as a software engineer and later as a quality assurance engineer, where I’ve now spent about 3 years. While this career path has provided financial stability, I’ve realized that my excitement and passion aren’t really there, unlike what I felt when studying or doing research in physics. Working in IT...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top