Bernoulli's Principle Explained: Ball vs Plane Wing

  • Thread starter Thread starter GoodApathy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bernoulli
AI Thread Summary
Bernoulli's principle states that in a flowing fluid, an increase in velocity results in a decrease in pressure, which is essential for understanding lift generation. While commonly applied to airplane wings, the principle is often misrepresented, particularly in the context of air particles traveling over and under the wing. A more accurate explanation for lift involves Newton's laws and the angle of attack, where the wing deflects air downward, creating an upward force. Additionally, the principle applies under specific conditions, such as incompressible and non-viscous flow. Understanding these nuances is crucial for accurately applying Bernoulli's principle in aerodynamics.
GoodApathy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Can someone explain to me Bernoulli's principle as simply as possible? Would this principle would be the same when applied to a ball as opposed to a plane's wing? Thanks a lot! :biggrin:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Bernoulli's principle says when fluid is flowing, an increase in velocity (speed and direction) occurs simultaneously with decrease in pressure. It describes a fluid flow with no viscosity, and therefore one in which a pressure difference is the only accelerating force, it is equivalent to Newton's laws of motion.

One way of understanding how an wing develops lift, relies on the difference in pressure above and below a wing. The pressure can be calculated by finding the velocities around the wing and using Bernoulli's equation. However, this explanation often uses false information, and is NOT the best way to explain it.

So-called Bernoulli explanations for flight, often make up a law of physics that says that air particles together at the front of the wing must end up together after passing over and under the wing, which tastes like a meat and city from Italy. Since the particles travel different distances in the same time, the particles of air going over the wing (over the hump, presumably) must go faster and thus have less pressure.

A better (and simpler) way to understand how wings can generate lift is via Sir Issac Newton's three laws. The wing, due to angle of attack (the angle formed by how far up the wing is pointed and the ground) and the Coanda effect (tendency for a fluid to stick to a convex surface. The side of a water bottle is convex, whilst a spoon is concave), deflects air downward causing the air to push back on the wing, providing lift.

You will find more here:
http://www.aa.washington.edu/faculty/eberhardt/lift.htm
http://www.physlink.com/Education/AskExperts/ae25.cfm
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=19014&

- :biggrin: Mk
 
Last edited by a moderator:
As simply as I can think to state it:

Energy at one point = Energy at another point.

The energy is made up of three terms; energy due to velocity, energy due to static pressure and energy due to position (elevation).

It is applicable under these circumstances: incompressible, non-viscous (no friction) and steady state (no transients) flow. Any deviation from these conditions introduces error.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top