Best calculus-based general physics textbook?

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the effectiveness of various calculus-based general physics textbooks, specifically criticizing Serway's "Physics for Engineers and Scientists" for its misalignment between exercises and text difficulty. The user is exploring alternatives, particularly "University Physics" by Young and "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Giancoli, while also noting "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker as a viable option. The consensus indicates a need for textbooks that provide better alignment between theory and practice to enhance understanding in physics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus concepts relevant to physics.
  • Familiarity with basic physics principles and terminology.
  • Experience with textbook-based learning in higher education.
  • Ability to evaluate educational resources based on reviews and personal experience.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "University Physics" by Young for its pedagogical approach and exercise alignment.
  • Investigate "Physics for Scientists and Engineers" by Giancoli for its clarity and problem-solving techniques.
  • Explore "Fundamentals of Physics" by Halliday, Resnick, and Walker for comprehensive coverage of introductory physics topics.
  • Read reviews and comparisons of calculus-based physics textbooks to determine the best fit for learning style.
USEFUL FOR

Students enrolled in calculus-based general physics courses, educators seeking effective teaching materials, and anyone looking to improve their understanding of physics concepts through better textbook resources.

annoyinggirl
Messages
217
Reaction score
10
I just finished taking first semester of calc-based general physics. My professor decided to use Serway's Physics for Engineers and Scientists, which at the end of the semester, even he agreed was a bad idea. The text itself was pretty good and filled with colorful pictures, but most of the exercises didn't match the text and were much too difficult for us to solve. I was generously given a C in the class due to the curve, and am now looking for a better textbook to brush up on what I didn't pick up or master what I failed to do with Serway's book before attempting the next semester of general physics.

From reading reviews, I'm debating between University Physics by Young and Physics for Scientists and Engineers by Giancoli (not to be confused with Serway's book of the same title).

Which of the two do you think is better? Or, if there is yet a better one, please tell me. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fundamentals of Physics by Halliday, Resnick and Walker is pretty good.
 

Similar threads

Review/refresher of college physics: textbook recommendations request
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Applied A question about mathematics textbooks for physicists
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
8K
Intro Physics BEST Calc- and Algebra-Based Textbooks with the same Chapter Sequence?
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
Intro Physics Discover the Benefits of OpenStax College Physics for Your Algebra-Based Class
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Intro Physics Calculus based intro physics textbook recommendations?
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
Intro Physics Best AP Physics 1&2 Textbooks for Self-Study: Giancoli and Serway/Vuille Review
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
9K
Classical Calculus-based physics textbooks
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
What if a modern physics textbook found itself back in time
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Intro Physics Textbook recommendations for calculus based physics course
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
12K
Will using Griffith and Purcell benefit a beginner in E&M?
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K