Best speed reducer for a simple project (gearbox design choice)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on selecting the optimal gearbox design for a project requiring a 20:1 reduction ratio, with two proposed designs: a worm gear and a train of 5 spur gears. The application demands an output torque of 5kg/cm and a maximum speed of 0.5RPM. The consensus is that the worm gear is preferable due to its reliability and efficiency at this ratio, while the spur gear train may incur larger losses. Additionally, the possibility of using an epicyclic gear system is suggested for better performance and space efficiency.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gearbox design principles
  • Knowledge of worm gear mechanics
  • Familiarity with spur gear configurations
  • Basic concepts of torque and speed calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research worm gear design specifications and applications
  • Learn about epicyclic gear systems and their advantages
  • Study tolerance stackup calculations for gear assemblies
  • Investigate backlash calculations and acceptable limits in gear systems
USEFUL FOR

Mechanical engineers, hobbyists designing robotic mechanisms, and anyone involved in gearbox design and optimization for low-speed applications.

awer
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR
I'm building a pan/tilt mechanism with a small stepper motor, and I need to design a simple 3d printable gearbox with a 20:1 ratio (aprox)
Hi,

As the summary says, I'm trying to design a simple gearbox with an approximate ratio of 20:1. I have two preliminary designs, one using a worm gear and another using a train of 5 spur gears. Both designs give me the desired ratio, but I really don't know which one I should choose.

The application requires an output torque of around 5kg/cm, and a maximum speed of 0.5RPM.

Both designs are pretty much the same in terms of manufacturing cost.

Coud you please suggest which option is better and explain why?

Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Some things to consider when making this decision:

1) Do a tolerance stackup calculation to make sure that it can be assembled and will work with realistic worst case part dimensions.

2) After #1 above, calculate the total backlash with realistic worst case part dimensions. Compare to the maximum acceptable backlash. You did calculate allowable backlash, didn't you?

3) Does the manufacturing cost include assembly labor?
 
awer said:
Summary: I'm building a pan/tilt mechanism with a small stepper motor, and I need to design a simple 3d printable gearbox with a 20:1 ratio (aprox)

Hi,

As the summary says, I'm trying to design a simple gearbox with an approximate ratio of 20:1. I have two preliminary designs, one using a worm gear and another using a train of 5 spur gears. Both designs give me the desired ratio, but I really don't know which one I should choose.

The application requires an output torque of around 5kg/cm, and a maximum speed of 0.5RPM.

Both designs are pretty much the same in terms of manufacturing cost.

Coud you please suggest which option is better and explain why?

Thanks
Generally, worm gear is fine for 20:1 ratios. Train of 5 spur gears would have larger loss and will be less reliable.

P.S. If you have a budget for 5 gears, may be better to consider a comparison between worm gear and epicyclic gear. Most of stepper motor reduction gears are epicyclic.
 
  • Like
Likes sysprog
The packaging constraints also enter into the picture. A worm is typically at right angles to the axis of the gear, whereas either a compound gear train on fixes axes or a compound epicyclic train have parallel input and output axes.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
Replies
14
Views
13K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K