Best Teleportation Fidelity to date

beautiful1
Messages
31
Reaction score
0
Hello all,

I am looking for references to experimentally measured quantum teleporation fidelities. In particular, I am trying to find what is the best fidelity to date.

So far I have:

Bouwmeester et al., Nature v390, p575 (1997),
0.70±0.3 (with polarization-encoded qubits, before subtracting the background counts)

Lombardi et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. v88, p070402 (2002),
0.95±0.6 (using vacuum-one-photon qubit)

Bowen et al. Phys. Rev. A v67, p032302 (2003),
0.64±0.02 (with quadrature squeezing, continuous variable teleportation.)

I'm sure most people are like me, and never bothered to look for others...but it would be great to know!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Boschi et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. v80, p1120 (1998)
0.853±0.012 (polarization-encoded, k-vector entangled two photon system)

Fursawa et al., Science, v 282, p 706 (1998)
0.58±0.02 (two-mode-squeezed quadrature states)

Kim et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., v86, p1370 (2001)
~0.83±?? (polarization-encoded, with complete Bell-state measurement)

Pan et al. Phys. Rev. Lett., v86, p4435 (2001)
0.85±?? (polarization-encoded, 4-fold GHZ state)

Jennewein et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., v88, p017903 (2002)
0.92±?? (polarization-encoded, entanglement swapping)

Marcikic et al., Nature v421, p509 (2003)
0.812±.025 (time-bin encoded, through 2 km of fibre)

Pan et al., Nature, v421, p721 (2003)
0.85±0.02 (polarization-encoded)

de Riedmatten et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., v92, p047904 (2004)
0.775±0.03 (time-bin entangled, over 2.2 km of fiber)

Ursin et al., Nature v430, p849 (2004),
0.90±?? (polarization-encoded, over 800 m of fibre under the Danube)p.s. I don't think I can edit my original post...
 
Last edited:
Bump

I started this thread over a year ago, and today I wanted to see if anyone had any new information regarding openly reported, experimentally measured teleportation fidelities.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Back
Top