Best way to cut a cake to avoid dryness

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter adimare
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the mathematical problem of determining the optimal way to cut a cylindrical cake to minimize the exposed surface area that could lead to dryness. Participants explore various cutting methods and their implications on surface area exposure, considering both theoretical and practical aspects.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant references a historical letter discussing a method to cut a cake that minimizes dryness by reducing exposed surface area, but introduces a restriction that prevents rearranging the cake after cutting.
  • Another participant calculates the exposed surface area for different cutting methods, noting that slicing off the top exposes a surface area of πR², while slicing a sector of angle 2π/N radians exposes 2Rh, with the larger area depending on the ratio of height to radius.
  • A different participant suggests that slicing a sector may not be optimal, as it consistently results in an exposed area of 2Rh, and proposes a single cut of length d as potentially better, questioning whether this is indeed the best solution.
  • One participant humorously suggests cutting from the bottom, arguing that the new base would seal the cake, while also mentioning practical kitchen tools for cutting cakes.
  • A later reply clarifies that the focus is on the mathematical problem rather than practical cutting methods, asserting that the ideal shape for minimizing surface area is still under exploration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the optimal cutting method, with no consensus reached on the best approach to minimize exposed surface area. Some methods are challenged, and various calculations are presented, indicating ongoing debate.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge that the effectiveness of cutting methods may depend on the relative dimensions of height and radius, and that assumptions about the cake's sealing properties are crucial to the discussion.

adimare
Messages
23
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
You have a cylindrical cake of radius R, height h. Assuming the outer surface of the cake seals the inside very well, how do you cut a slice of volume 1/N that minimizes the surface area that's exposed to the outside? Once the cake has been cut, you can't reshape or reposition the remaining cake in order to avoid dryness.
There's a very famous letter to the editor of Nature from 1906 that describes a process to cut a cake in a way that minimizes the exposed area to become dry. The solution is to cut a strip of cake from the middle with tho parallel lines, then put together the remaining chords together in order to stop them from getting dry. Here's a link to the letter: https://galton.org/essays/1900-1911/galton-1906-cake.pdf

However, let's say we add a restriction that forbids us from avoiding dryness by putting the remaining pieces of cake together and we actually have to come up with a way to cut a piece of cake that minimizes the surface area exposed to dryness, it becomes non trivial to solve.

Basically:
You have a cylindrical cake of radius R, height h. Assuming the outer surface of the cake seals the inside very well, how do you cut a slice of volume 1/N that minimizes the surface area that's exposed to the outside? Once the cake has been cut, you can't reshape or reposition the remaining cake in order to avoid dryness.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Slicing off the top 1/N exposes a surface area of \pi R^2.
Slicing a sector of angle 2\pi/N radians exposes a surface area of 2Rh.

Which is larger depends on whether \frac{h}{R} > \frac{\pi}{2}.

Alternatively, you can cut a sector of height h&#039; &lt; h and angle \theta such that \frac12 R^2\theta h&#039; = R^2 h \pi/ N, giving a surface area of <br /> 2Rh&#039; + \frac{2\pi h}{Nh&#039;}
 
Last edited:
Slicing off the top ##1/N## reduces the exposed area by ##2 \pi Rh/N##.
Slicing a sector of angle ##2 \pi /N## radians, adds ##2Rh## to the exposed area and removes ##2 \pi Rh/N + 2 \pi R^2 /N## from it.
##h \gt \pi R/N##?

P.S. Sorry, I've missed this part:
Assuming the outer surface of the cake seals the inside very well,
 
Last edited:
Slicing off a sector doesn't seem to be a good approach. No matter what the value of ##N## is, you'll end up with an exposed area of ##2Rh##

It's easy to prove there are better approaches. Ie: just doing a single cut of length ##d## like so:

0DEPUA1.png


Will result in an exposed area of ##dh##. With ##N=2## that'll equal ##2Rh## since ##d## will have to be right at the middle of the circle; but as N increases ##d## and therefore ##dh## will decrease, making it a much better solution. The question is: is it the best solution? Even if it turns out to be for a small value of ##h##; if ##h## gets too large relative to ##R## (as mentioned above) then eventually ##dh## will be larger than ##\pi R^2## so it'll make more sense to slice the cake horizontally.
 
Take a slice off the bottom ? The 'exposed' surface becomes the new base, mostly sealing it... :wink:

Having watched my beloved wife divide a monolithic cake into layers for 'filling', there are kitchen 'jigs' to do this cleanly. Think 'horizontal cheese-slice'. Single and eg Multi-tier types available...
download.jpg

( Problem related to taking small portions off big chunk of cheese to be eaten with eg breakfast rolls: Trick is to stay ahead of excessive desiccation or edible-mould growth... )
 
I appreciate the response. But I'm not really looking to cut a cake; I'm only interested in the mathematical problem. Yes, cutting a wedge from the middle and putting the two halves together would solve the problem in real life (as stated in the OP), same with your solution of cutting a slice from the bottom. However, what I'm looking for is the ideal shape that needs to be cut in order to expose the minimum amount of surface area. I'm pretty sure that when ##h## is very large compared to ##R##, then your solution is the best anyways. However, in that case I'd say the exposed area is ##\pi R^2## at the bottom, not 0.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Nik_2213

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
5K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
9K
Replies
10
Views
5K