Beta-function for the Gross-Neveu model

In summary, the ##\beta## function for the Gross-Neveu model is discussed in problem 12.2. After computing it, I found that the factor of ##g^2## found by Gross and Neveu seems to be because they are using a different definition from P&S, which would amount to ##\beta/g##. I would say Xianyu's solutions are likely trustworthy.
  • #1
Manu_
12
1
Homework Statement
In the Peskin & Schroeder textbook, the $\beta$-function for the Gross-Neveu model is discussed in problem 12.2. After computing it, I have tried checking my results with some solutions found online. My problem is that they all disagree among each other (something quite recurrent for this book actually).
Relevant Equations
$$\mathcal{L} = \bar{\Psi}_{i}(i\not{\partial} )\Psi_{i}-g\sigma \bar{\Psi}_i\Psi_i-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2$$

$$\delta_{Z_{\Psi}}=(ig)^2\int \frac{d^{d}k}{(2\pi)^d} Tr[\frac{i\not{k}}{k^2}\frac{i}{(k+p)^2}]=0 $$

$$\delta_{Z_{\sigma}}=-N(ig)^2\int \frac{d^{d}k}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{i\not{k}}{k^2} \frac{i(\not{k}+\not{p})}{(k+p)^2} =-Ng^2 \int \frac{d^{d}k}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{1}{(k+p)^2} =-Ng^2\frac{i}{4\pi\epsilon}+finite$$

$$\delta_{g}=(ig)^3 \int \frac{d^{d}k}{(2\pi)^d} Tr[\frac{i(\not{k}+\not{p_1})}{(k+p_1)^2} \frac{i(\not{k}+\not{p_2})}{(k+p_2)^2}] = ig^3 \int \frac{d^{d}k}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{-2k^2}{(k+p_1)^2 (k+p_2)^2}+...=-2ig^3\frac{i}{4\pi\epsilon} $$
In the Peskin & Schroeder textbook, the ##\beta## function for the Gross-Neveu model is discussed in problem 12.2. After computing it, I have tried checking my results with some solutions found online. My problem is that they all disagree among each other (something quite recurrent for this book actually). I have basically followed the original paper from Gross and Neveu:

- We start from the Lagrangian $$\mathcal{L} = \bar{\Psi}_{i}(i\not{\partial} )\Psi_{i}-g\sigma \bar{\Psi}_i\Psi_i-\frac{1}{2}\sigma^2.$$
- We compute the field strength renormalisation

For ##\Psi: ## $$\delta_{Z_{\Psi}}=(ig)^2\int \frac{d^{d}k}{(2\pi)^d} Tr[\frac{i\not{k}}{k^2}\frac{i}{(k+p)^2}]=0 $$

For ##\sigma:## $$\delta_{Z_{\sigma}}=-N(ig)^2\int \frac{d^{d}k}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{i\not{k}}{k^2} \frac{i(\not{k}+\not{p})}{(k+p)^2} =-Ng^2 \int \frac{d^{d}k}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{1}{(k+p)^2} =-Ng^2\frac{i}{4\pi\epsilon}+finite$$

- We compute the coupling renormalisation (though in the Gross-Neveu original paper, the authors argue the vertex need not be renormalised. That is a point I don't get)

$$\delta_{g}=(ig)^3 \int \frac{d^{d}k}{(2\pi)^d} Tr[\frac{i(\not{k}+\not{p_1})}{(k+p_1)^2} \frac{i(\not{k}+\not{p_2})}{(k+p_2)^2}] = ig^3 \int \frac{d^{d}k}{(2\pi)^d}\frac{-2k^2}{(k+p_1)^2 (k+p_2)^2}+...=-2ig^3\frac{i}{4\pi\epsilon} $$

- We use relation (12.53)

$$\beta (g) = M\frac{\partial}{\partial M}\left(-\delta_g +\frac{1}{2}g\sum_i \delta_{Z_i} \right)=-\frac{2g^3}{4\pi}+g\frac{-Ng^2}{4\pi}=-\frac{g^3}{4\pi}(N+2)$$

It is asymptotically free, but I do fully trust my result. Any comment welcome!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Can you provide the references you found for this calculation?

Thanks!
 
  • #4
You should find that the beta function vanishes for ##N = 1## (where ##N## is the number of two-component Dirac fermions, as in P&S's notation). This is because of a well-known equivalence between that model and that of a free massless boson. So I'm biased towards the Xianyu solutions being correct, unless somehow Murayama's definition of ##N## is given by twice the definition in P&S (which some authors like to do, since that definition of ##N## is the total number of components*flavors).

Also, after converting the difference in notations, Zinn-Justin's textbook also gives the same beta function as Xianyu's solution (he uses a different regularization scheme, but it is well-known that this doesn't change the one-loop contribution to the beta function).

I will take a look at your computations when I have time, but in the meantime I would say Xianyu's solutions are likely trustworthy.
 
  • #5
Thanks King Vitamin, I will take a look in that textbook.
Actually, there is a mistake in my first post, where I used (ig) instead of (-ig) for the coupling, and this changes the final result to (N-2) instead of (N+2). But I still have to find out how to edit my post...
 

1. What is the Beta-function for the Gross-Neveu model?

The Beta-function for the Gross-Neveu model is a mathematical function used to describe the behavior of the coupling constant in the model as a function of energy scale. It is a key tool in studying the renormalization group flow of the model.

2. How is the Beta-function calculated for the Gross-Neveu model?

The Beta-function for the Gross-Neveu model is typically calculated using perturbation theory, which involves expanding the coupling constant in a series and calculating the contributions from each order. This can be a complex and time-consuming process, but it allows for precise calculations of the Beta-function.

3. What is the significance of the Beta-function in the Gross-Neveu model?

The Beta-function is an important tool in understanding the behavior of the Gross-Neveu model at different energy scales. It helps to determine the stability of the model and whether it is a valid description of the physical system being studied.

4. How does the Beta-function change with different parameters in the Gross-Neveu model?

The behavior of the Beta-function can vary depending on the parameters of the Gross-Neveu model, such as the number of fermion fields or the dimension of spacetime. In some cases, the Beta-function may exhibit fixed points, indicating a stable theory, while in others it may diverge, signaling an unstable theory.

5. Can the Beta-function be used to make predictions about the Gross-Neveu model?

While the Beta-function itself does not make direct predictions about the Gross-Neveu model, it is a crucial tool in the theoretical analysis of the model. By studying the behavior of the Beta-function, scientists can gain insight into the behavior of the model at different energy scales and make predictions about its stability and validity.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
23
Views
568
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
909
Replies
27
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
797
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
689
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
710
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
536
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
920
Back
Top