Quantum Better advanced Quantum Mechanics book than Sakurai?

Click For Summary
Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics is recognized as a strong graduate textbook, particularly in its first half, but the latter portion shows a noticeable decline in clarity due to the author's untimely passing. This has led to a search for alternative textbooks that maintain a consistent quality throughout. Leslie Ballentine's "Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development" is recommended as a suitable alternative, though it lacks the simplicity of Sakurai's style. While Ballentine offers valuable insights on topics like non-relativistic space-time symmetries and rigged Hilbert space, his approach is more formal and deductive, differing from Sakurai's intuitive style.
Elaren
Messages
7
Reaction score
4
Sakurai's Modern Quantum Mechanics is 1/2 of a very good graduate textbook. Unfortunately Sakurai passed away midway through writing it, and it is very obvious exactly where it swapped from their writing to just using their notes. The back half of the book, while by no means bad, is notably less easy to follow. I was wondering if anyone had a recommendation for a textbook covering the same material at the same level that has a more constant quality thorughout, in line with the first 3 chapters of Sakurai.
 
  • Like
Likes dextercioby and jbergman
Physics news on Phys.org
Try Leslie Ballentine's "Quantum Mechanics - A Modern Development".

The two things I like most about Sakurai is his style of using the simplest way to make his point and his little insights which aren't highlighted as much in other texts (his treatment of basis vectors in the different pictures and the relationship between symmetry and degeneracy come to mind).

Ballentine doesn't reach Sakurai regarding the first thing (I don't know of a book which does) but he has plenty of the second (non-relativistic space-time symmetries, rigged Hilbert space and interpretation come to mind). His approach is more formal and deductive than Sakurai's but still very well-grounded in the physics.
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and DrClaude
Im currently reading mathematics for physicists by Philippe Dennery and André Krzywicki, and I’m understanding most concepts however I think it would be better for me to get a book on complex analysis or calculus to better understand it so I’m not left looking at an equation for an hour trying to figure out what it means. So here comes the split, do I get a complex analysis book? Or a calculus book? I might be able to Borrow a calculus textbook from my math teacher study that for a bit and...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
408
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K