Better Textbook than Lamarsh for Nuclear Engineering

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion critiques Lamarsh's "Introduction to Nuclear Engineering" for its confusing derivations and unnecessary equations. Users express a preference for clearer alternatives, specifically recommending "Fundamentals of Nuclear Science and Engineering" by J. Kenneth Shultis as a more straightforward option. While some acknowledge that Lamarsh has merits, the consensus leans towards seeking textbooks that enhance understanding without convoluted explanations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Familiarity with basic nuclear engineering concepts
  • Understanding of physics equations and their applications
  • Knowledge of unit conversions in scientific calculations
  • Experience with academic textbook analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Research "Fundamentals of Nuclear Science and Engineering" by J. Kenneth Shultis
  • Explore Griffiths's physics textbooks for clarity in complex topics
  • Investigate alternative nuclear engineering textbooks and their reviews
  • Examine common pitfalls in textbook derivations and how to avoid them
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for nuclear engineering students, educators seeking effective teaching materials, and professionals looking to enhance their understanding of nuclear concepts through clearer textbooks.

pierce15
Messages
313
Reaction score
2
I browsed this forum a while ago and saw that several people recommend Lamarsh's Introduction to Nuclear Engineering as an intro to this field. I have read about half of this book and really don't like it. Some of the equations are derived in confusing/roundabout ways. For example, many formulas are derived which only work with particular units plugged in. Other times, unnecessary equations are added in derivations. I am wondering if anyone has a similar experience and if they can recommend a textbook more clear in explaining things (for example, Griffiths's physics textbooks).
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fundamentals of Nuclear Science and Engineering by J. Kenneth Shultis is a good option, and its not very confusing. But I should add that Lamarsh is not that bad.
 

Similar threads

Nuclear Looking for Nuclear Engineering must reads
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Quantum Recommended Textbooks for Quantum Field Theory and Antiparticles
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Intro Physics Starting fresh, but where to start?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Undergrad A question I have about my L.A. textbook (2)
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Efficient Study Tips for Physics, Math, and Engineering Subjects
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
What Historical Math Textbooks Offer Unique Insights?
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Looking for a good textbook/book
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
Yet Another Request for a Textbook Recommendation
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
Algebra/Trignometry based Physics textbooks
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
5K
Are Recent Students All Google Crazy?
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K