Big Bang Predictions - Exploring Energy Density & Expansion Rate

  • Thread starter Thread starter electerr
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Big bang
electerr
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I am trying to understand how it is possible to make predictions about the energy density of early universe using the freidman equation if the expansion rate of the universe has not been constant throughout history. As I understand it there are three main variables in the freidman equation, the energy density, the Hubble constant squared (the expansion rate of the universe) and the shape of space (K). We know today that space is flat (or very close to flat) but in order to calculate anything with the other two variables one of them must also be known. I thought that the expansion rate was first thought to accelerate, decrease, and is now accelerating again and that as the universe has expanded that radiation particles has become redshifted and lost energy changing the energy density. With these two unfixed variables how can you say anything certain about either one? As you can probably guess this is all very new to me so maybe I am missing something very obvious but maybe I would be thankful if someone can try and clue me in...?
 
Space news on Phys.org
The Friedmann equation comes from the 00 component of the field equations, but we also have the acceleration equation which comes from the trace. This gives a set of two equations in two variables.
 
electerr said:
Hi,

I am trying to understand how it is possible to make predictions about the energy density of early universe using the freidman equation if the expansion rate of the universe has not been constant throughout history.
No need to use the Friedmann equation. Just use conservation of stress-energy and the scale factor.

Of course, if you want this as a function of time, you have to use the Friedmann equation, but if doing it as a function of either redshift or scale factor is your concern, there's no need.
 
Ok, I didn't know about the separate Friedmann acceleration equation. Thanks for the help!
 
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Recombination_(cosmology) Was a matter density right after the decoupling low enough to consider the vacuum as the actual vacuum, and not the medium through which the light propagates with the speed lower than ##({\epsilon_0\mu_0})^{-1/2}##? I'm asking this in context of the calculation of the observable universe radius, where the time integral of the inverse of the scale factor is multiplied by the constant speed of light ##c##.
The formal paper is here. The Rutgers University news has published a story about an image being closely examined at their New Brunswick campus. Here is an excerpt: Computer modeling of the gravitational lens by Keeton and Eid showed that the four visible foreground galaxies causing the gravitational bending couldn’t explain the details of the five-image pattern. Only with the addition of a large, invisible mass, in this case, a dark matter halo, could the model match the observations...
Hi, I’m pretty new to cosmology and I’m trying to get my head around the Big Bang and the potential infinite extent of the universe as a whole. There’s lots of misleading info out there but this forum and a few others have helped me and I just wanted to check I have the right idea. The Big Bang was the creation of space and time. At this instant t=0 space was infinite in size but the scale factor was zero. I’m picturing it (hopefully correctly) like an excel spreadsheet with infinite...

Similar threads

Replies
20
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
29
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
3K
Back
Top