Binding energy and deuterium nucleus

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The average binding energy per nucleon in the deuterium nucleus is calculated to be 1.12 MeV/c², derived from the mass defect of the nucleus. The binding energy per nucleon is significantly higher than the binding energy of the electron to the hydrogen nucleus, with a calculated ratio of approximately 83,250:1. This indicates that the neutron is held more tightly than the electron in the deuterium nucleus. The calculations utilize mass values for deuterium, protons, and neutrons, as well as conversions between MeV and eV.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of nuclear physics concepts, specifically binding energy.
  • Familiarity with mass-energy equivalence (E=mc²).
  • Knowledge of particle masses in MeV/c².
  • Ability to perform unit conversions between MeV, eV, and Joules.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the concept of mass defect and its relation to binding energy in nuclear physics.
  • Learn about the calculation of binding energy per nucleon for other isotopes.
  • Explore the significance of binding energy ratios in nuclear stability and reactions.
  • Investigate the implications of binding energy in nuclear fission and fusion processes.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in nuclear physics, physicists focusing on atomic structure, and educators teaching concepts related to binding energy and nuclear interactions.

alicia113
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


a) Calculate the average binding energy per nucleon in the deuterium nucleus.
b) The energy that binds an orbiting electron to the hydrogen nucleus is 13.4eV. Calculate the ratio of the binding energy per nucleon to the binding energy per electron in deuterium. Which particle is held more tightly, the electron or the neutron?

Homework Equations



Given:

m of deuterium= 1876.12MeV/c^2
m of electron = 0.511MeV/c^2
m of neutron = 939.57 MeV/c^2
m of proton = 938.27 MeV/c^2
*all masses are also given in kg and u, but the example my text gives its answer in MeV/c^2
E=mc^2

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
a) Deuterium-electron=mass of nucleus
(1876.12MeV/c^2)-(0.511MeV/c^2)=1875.609MeV/c^2

Proton+Neutron= (938.27 MeV/c^2)+(939.57 MeV/c^2) = 1877.84MeV/c^2

(proton+neutron)-(mass of nucleus)= (1877.84MeV/c^2)-(1875.609MeV/c^2)= 2.231MeV/c^2

(2.231MeV/c^2)/2nucleons=1.1155

Therefore the average binding energy per nucleon in the deuterium nucleus is 1.12MeV/c^2 (to 3 sigfigs)

I know this is a mass and not an energy but the example earlier in my book gave the average binding energy per nucleon in MeV/c^2, kg, or u so I'm inclined to leave my answer as a mass.

b) I think I should multiply 1.1155MeV/c^2 by 1000000 to eliminate the M:

(1.1155MeV/c^2)x(1000000)= 1115500eV/c^2

Then convert eV/c^2 to kg:

1eV/c^2= 1.78266173 × 10-36 kg
11155500eV/c^2= 1.98855916 e-30kg

E=mc^2
E=(1.98855916 e-30kg)(2.998 e8)^2
E=1.78731777 e-13J

Convert Joules to eV:

1J = 6.24150974 e18 eV
1.78731777 e-13J = 1115556.126eV

Ratio of binding energy per nucleon to electron= 1115556.126eV/13.4eV= 83250:1

Therefore the neutron is held more tightly than the electron as expressed by the ratio 8.32e4:1.



I'm not sure if this is done correctly. Did I convert from MeV/c^2 to eV properly? I think the answer is wrong because my binding energy in both eV/c^2 and eV are both 1.12 e6.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you pointed out, a value like 1.12 MeV/c^2 has units of mass, not energy. So, really this number is a mass defect. The equivalent binding energy is simply ##E=(\Delta m)c^2##, which in this example would be 1.12 MeV.

Assuming this number is correct (the reasoning seems to be ok), the ratio of this binding energy to the binding energy of the electron is then simply the ratio ##1.12 \times 10^6 / 13.6##.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K