Binomial Theorem and Induction with Trigonometry

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating coefficients in binomial expansions and using mathematical induction to prove trigonometric identities. A specific example provided is finding the coefficient of x^8 in the expansion of (3 + (5/X)^2)^10. Participants discuss the process of applying mathematical induction to prove identities involving sums of sine functions and products of cosine functions. Key steps include establishing a base case for n=1 and using the induction hypothesis to prove the statements for n+1. The conversation emphasizes clarity in notation and the logical progression of proofs.
Wellsi
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
Ok i need help to calculate the co-efficients of certain terms in the binomial expansion for example:

(3 + (5/X)^2)^10
what is the coefficient of x^8?

I hope that question works sorry if it doesn't i did just make it up then...
if you know of any like it please help!

also, an excerise left me confused as anything the other day - it was integrating mathematical induction and trigonometric relationships... ill post the questions in about an hour does anyone know how these work the entire K+1 thing throws me off
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
ok here are the questions i was going to post:
5) Use the principle of mathematical induction to prove that:
sinx + sin3x + sin5x + ... + sin(2n-1)x = (1-cos2nx)/(2sinx)
for all positive intergers n and hence find the value of
sin(pi/7) + sin(3pi/7) + sin(5pi/7) ... + sin(13pi/7)

6)Use the principle of mathematical induction to prove that:
cosx x cos2x x cos4x x cos8x ... x cos((2^n)x)= (sin(2^n)x)/(2^n x sinx)
 
Ok... Go searching
 
Wellsi said:
ok here are the questions i was going to post:
5) Use the principle of mathematical induction to prove that:
sinx + sin3x + sin5x + ... + sin(2n-1)x = (1-cos2nx)/(2sinx)
for all positive intergers n and hence find the value of
sin(pi/7) + sin(3pi/7) + sin(5pi/7) ... + sin(13pi/7)

6)Use the principle of mathematical induction to prove that:
cosx x cos2x x cos4x x cos8x ... x cos((2^n)x)= (sin(2^n)x)/(2^n x sinx)

First, please do not use "x" both as a variable and to mean multiplication. Use parentheses or "*" instead.

Now, what have you tried? What happens in each of those when n= 1?
How do you go from sinx + sin3x + sin5x + ... + sin(2n-1)x to sinx + sin3x + sin5x + ... + sin(2(n+1)-1)x ?

How do you go from (cosx)(cos2x)(cos4x)(cos8)... (cos((2^n)x)) to (cosx)(cos2x)(cos4x)(cos8)... (cos((2^(n+1))x))?
 
LIke HallsofIvy instructed, first you have to prove that for n=1 that equation holds true. So prove that sinx=(1-cos2nx)/2sinx , for n=1. After you prove this, than suppose that the equation also holds true for n,( or n=k,it is the same) so you suppose that the equation:
sinx+ sin3x+...+sin(2n-1)x=(1-cos2nx)/2sinx is true, or is valid, this is called the inductin hypothesis(hi)
and after this you have to prove that the above equation also holds true for n+1(or n=k+1),

so what you have to prove is this:

sinx+sin3x+...+sin(2n-1)x+sin(2(n+1)-1)=(1-cos2(n+1)x)/2sinx

The other two problems follow almost the same pattern.
Now do you kno what to do?

anyone, correct me if i am wrong
i hope it helps
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top