Biomechanics of Skiing: Balancing & Knee Forces

  • Thread starter Thread starter FontysPhysioGuy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Biomechanics Skiing
AI Thread Summary
Ski athletes maintain balance during turns by leaning into the turn, counteracting centrifugal forces with gravitational components, while also decelerating. The center of gravity (COG) can be positioned over the feet, but improper form may lead to increased stress on joints and muscles. Forces acting on the knee joint primarily come from the quadriceps, which can exceed four times the athlete's body weight when the knees are bent. Proper alignment ensures that the resultant force is directed along the leg's axis, minimizing harmful twisting forces. Understanding these biomechanics is crucial for injury prevention and performance enhancement in skiing.
FontysPhysioGuy
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi Everyone!

I am a physio and I'm currently working with some alpine ski athletes. I don't have a lot of experience with this sport, so I tried to understand some basics about the physics and biomechanics of the sport. (The athlete is in my practice for a knee injury).

Looking at the picture, I have some questions.

1) I want to understand how the athlete is able to keep his balance? His COG/COM is way out of his base of support, so why doesn't he fall?
2) I want to understand the forces acting on the knee joint? I tried to make a free body diagram, but I can't work it out...

Can someone please help me with this?

Thanks in advance!
 

Attachments

  • Schermafbeelding 2018-12-29 om 20.05.03.png
    Schermafbeelding 2018-12-29 om 20.05.03.png
    56.1 KB · Views: 444
Physics news on Phys.org
FontysPhysioGuy said:
1) I want to understand how the athlete is able to keep his balance? His COG/COM is way out of his base of support, so why doesn't he fall?
He's making a turn. Much like a racing motorcyclist he's leaning into the turn, so as to counteract the centrifugal force with gravitational component.
FontysPhysioGuy said:
2) I want to understand the forces acting on the knee joint? I tried to make a free body diagram, but I can't work it out...
I'm pretty sure the resultant force should be directed along the axis of the leg, so that there's no unhealthy sideways twisting on the knee. Ideally, as far as the knee is concerned, the forces should be no different than when squatting. But then again, I'm no skier, so I've no idea how close to this ideal do they get in practice.
 
FontysPhysioGuy said:
1) I want to understand how the athlete is able to keep his balance? His COG/COM is way out of his base of support, so why doesn't he fall?
Bandersnatch said:
He's making a turn. Much like a racing motorcyclist he's leaning into the turn, so as to counteract the centrifugal force with gravitational component.
That's only half the answer; He's likely also decelerating. Either way, the combined issue is the same: he's roughly vertical with respect to his g-vector, which is the combination of his acceleration (turning and decelerating) and gravity. (though with his legs apart, the COG could be over either, not necessarily exactly centered).
2) I want to understand the forces acting on the knee joint? I tried to make a free body diagram, but I can't work it out...
I'm pretty sure the resultant force should be directed along the axis of the leg, so that there's no unhealthy sideways twisting on the knee. Ideally, as far as the knee is concerned, the forces should be no different than when squatting. But then again, I'm no skier, so I've no idea how close to this ideal do they get in practice.
Yes. Another way to think about it is that for any column, the force is always along the axis of the column (even a bent column like on a scissor lift). Columns don't do well with twisting or off-axis forces. Because of the length of the ski, it is possible for the skiier's COG to be forward or behind (more likely behind) his feet, but it is bad form and puts extra stress on muscles/joints. So with proper form, the force vector points from the skiier's COG toward his ankles.
 
FontysPhysioGuy said:
2) I want to understand the forces acting on the knee joint? I tried to make a free body diagram, but I can't work it out...
With the knees bend like this, most of the knee joint force will come from the muscles (mainly quadriceps), and can be more than 4 times bodyweight. See Figure 5F here:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3171531/figure/Fig5/
 
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...
Back
Top