Black Holes and Quantum Field Theory

jbcool
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Now, I must preface this by saying that my understanding of QFT is limited, and my understanding of GR is even more so. Nevertheless, I was reading about the No Hair Theorem, and it seemed to me to be suggestive of the indiscernibility of Quantum Particles. Obviously, for a macroscopic black hole, this is merely analogy, but for a microscopic black hole, this isn't necessarily true. If a black hole can be quantized solely by M, Q, and L, then, on the microscopic level, it would make sense to have Q at the very least quantized. It also wouldn't be entirely out of the question to associate L with spin, since they are both intrinsic angular momenta. This would lead one to conclude that black holes must be bosonic since they can have 0 angular momenta (Schwarzschild BH). If it were some how possible to attribute a bosonic field to a black hole, it would make sense to describe it by the two coupling constants Q and M, and have a spin L. Is this logical, or is it too speculative.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The Schwarzschild solution is a solution for GR, it does not imply that it is a quantum-mechanical solution.

Spin quantisation of black holes... I am sure there are publications about it, but I don't know any.
This is about charge
 
Thanks. I wasn't saying that the Schwarzschild solution was also a QM solution, merely that it shows a black hole can have 0 angular momentum.
 
It shows that there is a spacetime geometry with 0 angular momentum. But that is just a mathematical thing. We don't know if this solution (in GR) can exist in the universe.

I wouldn't expect BH to be fermions, but maybe they are? Or even something completely different, as the classification gets more complicated once we leave the classical 3 dimensions.
 
True. I guess a more pressing issue is whether the metric even applies at quantum scales. Still, it seems that the No Hair theorem is suggestive of a link between QM and GR.
 
In real life, black holes form from collapsing objects, and the odds of producing a hole with zero angular momentum is just that, essentially zero. In fact every black hole will have at least some angular momentum and therefore be Kerr rather than Schwarschild.

And as far as a black hole being bosonic or fermionic, all you have to do is drop one additional electron into the hole to make it the other one.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
44
Views
3K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Back
Top