Black Holes and their original star

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the nature of black holes and their relationship to the original stars from which they formed. Participants explore concepts of gravity, the behavior of matter near black holes, and the portrayal of black holes in popular media. The conversation touches on theoretical and conceptual aspects of astrophysics.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants suggest that black holes are often more exciting to discuss than the original stars due to their dramatic nature and frequent representation in media.
  • It is noted that from a distance, the gravitational effects of black holes and their original stars are similar, but black holes exhibit stronger gravitational effects as one approaches the event horizon.
  • Participants mention that black holes do not "suck in" matter in the same way as might be popularly believed; rather, they only affect objects that come too close.
  • There is a clarification that black holes cannot be accurately described using Newtonian physics, particularly regarding their extreme gravitational effects at the event horizon.
  • One participant highlights that fast-moving matter may not be captured by a black hole unless it enters a close orbit, where it may lose energy and spiral inward.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the nature of black holes and their gravitational effects, but there are differing views on the portrayal of black holes in media and the implications of their gravitational influence on nearby matter.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the reliance on Newtonian physics for initial comparisons, which may not fully capture the complexities of black holes as described by General Relativity. The discussion does not resolve the nuances of how black holes interact with matter at varying distances.

Johnnb
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Black holes suck in everything around them. My 5 year old knows that one. It's all over TV, etc. But what about the original star? Wouldn't that have just as much gravity? Wouldn't it do the same thing with the strength? Is it just that black holes are more exciting to talk about?
 
Space news on Phys.org
Johnnb said:
Black holes suck in everything around them. My 5 year old knows that one. It's all over TV, etc. But what about the original star? Wouldn't that have just as much gravity? Wouldn't it do the same thing with the strength? Is it just that black holes are more exciting to talk about?

From a distance, the gravitational effect of a black hole is very similar to that of the original star, but you can get a LOT closer to it (remember Newtonian field is -Gm/r2 where r is the distance to the center) so the field strength gets very much stronger. In General Relativity, it doesn't just get stronger but it effectively becomes irresistible at the "event horizon", so you can't just swing round and back out again.

They don't really "suck in" things at a given distance any more than a non-black hole of the same mass, but anything that gets too close is not going to get away again.

Representations of black holes in fiction are generally totally non-scientific and should be ignored.
 
Your comment answers my question. In essence, it sounds like black hole are just more "sexy" for the science type channels for the most part. It seems like they all have a new show about black holes every month.
 
Johnnb said:
Your comment answers my question. In essence, it sounds like black hole are just more "sexy" for the science type channels for the most part. It seems like they all have a new show about black holes every month.

They do make interesting TV!

Its important though to remeber BH's cannot be properly described by Newtonian physics.

The crucial part to remember is that at a distance black holes gravity are the same as any other body of mass, but once something crosses the Event Horizon - even a photon, its never getting out, essentially the gravity is so extreme that all world lines lead further into the BH.
 
One other important thing to realize about black holes is that until matter gets into a rather close orbit, they don't actually suck anything in. If you are a fast-moving bit of matter coming into the vicinity of a black hole, chances are you'll just end up missing the black hole entirely, simply because the black hole is very, very small. But if you find yourself in a relatively close orbit, well, then you'll progressively lose energy to gravitational radiation and spiral inward into the black hole.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
7K