Black holes: best candidate for dark matter?

AI Thread Summary
Black holes, primarily formed from ordinary matter, are considered a potential candidate for dark matter (DM), particularly through the existence of Intermediate Mass Black Holes (IMBHs). However, their formation from baryonic material presents challenges, as standard Big Bang nucleosynthesis (BBN) can only account for 4% of the closure density needed for DM, while 23% is required. The "Freely Coasting" Cosmology model suggests that if the universe's expansion were linear, black holes could contribute significantly to DM, potentially leaving behind Warm-Hot Intergalactic Medium (WHIM) that aligns with observed mass density limits. Despite the theoretical possibility of primordial black holes forming from radiation in the early universe, many astronomers remain skeptical about black holes being the primary source of dark matter due to constraints from nucleosynthesis and the cosmic microwave background. Overall, while black holes could contribute to the DM puzzle, significant uncertainties and limitations remain in their viability as the main component of dark matter.
Loren Booda
Messages
3,108
Reaction score
4
Black holes are constructed from ordinary matter. Their charge to mass ratio, a measure of photonic interaction, is comparatively small. They have been indirectly (gravitationally) observed. They are common in the halos of galaxies where older, Population II stars have hereto collapsed, and where the telltale circular rotation indicates. Potential galactic black holes, formed in the early universe, could well occupy the halo.
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
Hi Loren!
Could DM be BHs? This is a qualified yes, they are a favourite candidate of mine!

A population of IMBHs (Intermediate Mass Black Holes) of mass 102 MassSolar - 104 MassSolar might not have been detected and could fit the bill of DM.

However two major problems.
1. They would have formed from baryonic material and the standard model BBN can produce only 4% closure density whereas we need another 23% for DM.

2. Their formation would most likely not be 100% efficient and so a lot of unbound mass would still be around.

Do BHs then fit the DM bill?

They could go a long way to making up the 23% if the BBN restriction was lifted. This cannot happen in ordinary BBN, however if the expansion of the universe happened in a strictly linear fashion then it would fit the bill. The “Freely Coasting” Cosmology model requires about 20% or so baryonic density to produce the correct element abundances. (All except deuterium which has to be made from spallation).

The BHs would mostly then be the end product of the PopIII stars widely believed to have pre-existed galactic formation.

They would probably leave behind about half their mass, which might now be in the form of WHIM (Warm-Hot Intergalactic Medium). Enough WHIM (with very large error bars) has been detected to allow for this: Measured Cosmological Mass Density in the WHIM: the Solution to the ’Missing Baryons’ Problem, their upper limit of WHIM is:
\Omega_bWHIM > 4.3 × 100.47 % = 12.6%
and their lower WHIM limit is:
\Omega_bWHIM > 1.3 × 100.32 % = 2.7%?

Which is only just consistent (by stretching a point) with the standard model of about \Omega_b = 0.04 of which \Omega_b(missing) = 2.1 +0.5/−0.4) % (Nicastro et al., A Warm-Hot Intergalactic Medium Location for the Missing Cosmic Baryons, Nature, accepted for publication (2004):). That is, the lower limit on the WHIM observed is slightly more than the standard model can allow.

But also note this is consistent with a much higher \Omega_{WHIM} allowed by the Freely Coasting Model BBN \Omega_b ~ 0.2

In this scenario half the DM is now WHIM and half IMBHs ~ 103 MassSolar.

Garth
 
Last edited:
Loren Booda said:
Black holes are constructed from ordinary matter.

Actually, if this were always true, it would make them a terrible dark matter candidate (except for Garth, who needs more ordinary matter for his theory). In standard \Lambda CDM and its close relatives, the dark matter needs to be non-baryonic in order to satisfy the constraints we have from nucleosynthesis and the CMB. Since the dark matter is thought to be weakly-interacting, it's hard to imagine how it could have collected into black holes.

Black holes don't, however, need to form from matter. Many believe that there could be a sizable population of primordial black holes; that is, black holes that formed in the early universe. Since the early universe is radiation-dominated, this means that primordial black holes would likely have formed primarily from radiation.

Even given the possibility of primordial black holes, however, I think few (if any) astronomers would put their money on black holes as the dark matter. We've already ruled out a large part of parameter space (M_{PBH}<10^{15} g, M_{PBH}>10^4 M_{sun}, M\sim M_{sun}) and most theoretical calculations suggest that PBHs would form with a bottom-heavy mass distribution. Furthermore, accretion onto these things might cause problems for reionization.

If nucleosynthesis and WMAP interpretations were wrong, one can still ask whether or not the dark matter BHs could have formed from Pop III stars. In conventional theories of structure formation (and even stellar evolution), this would be an extremely difficult task. Remember that 90% of all matter in the universe is dark matter -- that means you'd need 90% of the universe to have formed heavy Pop III stars at a very early epoch. Given that we see virtually no low-mass remnants of such an extreme star formation event, that seems very unlikely.
 
Last edited:
Publication: Redox-driven mineral and organic associations in Jezero Crater, Mars Article: NASA Says Mars Rover Discovered Potential Biosignature Last Year Press conference The ~100 authors don't find a good way this could have formed without life, but also can't rule it out. Now that they have shared their findings with the larger community someone else might find an explanation - or maybe it was actually made by life.
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
40
Views
6K
Back
Top