Black holes in the early universe

AI Thread Summary
Black holes in the early universe are believed to grow in a self-regulated manner, primarily hidden from direct observation due to significant gas and dust obscuration. Research indicates that these black holes, particularly in galaxies at redshifts z=6-8, grow in tandem with their host galaxies, starting shortly after the Big Bang. Although some massive black holes have been detected in quasars, their formation channels remain unclear as initial seed properties are quickly erased during growth. The findings suggest that these early black holes may have a more substantial growth rate than previously thought and do not significantly contribute to the re-ionization of the universe through ultraviolet emissions. The possibility of these black holes being remnants from previous cosmic cycles adds another layer of intrigue to their study.
bcrowell
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
6,723
Reaction score
431
I'm pretty ignorant about astrophysics, but this made it into the newspaper today, and it seemed interesting.

http://arxiv.org/abs/1106.3079

"Black hole growth in the early Universe is self-regulated and largely hidden from view," Treister et al.

"The formation of the first massive objects in the infant Universe remains impossible to observe directly and yet it sets the stage for the subsequent evolution of galaxies. While some black holes with masses > billion solar masses? have been detected in luminous quasars less than one billion years after the Big Bang, these individual extreme objects have limited utility in constraining the channels of formation of the earliest black holes. The initial conditions of black hole seed properties are quickly erased during the growth process. From deep, optimally stacked, archival X-ray observations, we measure the amount of black hole growth in z=6-8 galaxies (0.7-1 billion years after the Big Bang). Our results imply that black holes grow in tandem with their hosts throughout cosmic history, starting from the earliest times. We find that most copiously accreting black holes at these epochs are buried in significant amounts of gas and dust that absorb most radiation except for the highest energy X-rays. This suggests that black holes grow significantly more than previously thought during these early bursts, and due to obscuration they do not contribute to the re-ionization of the Universe with their ultraviolet emission. "
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
It's possible that such black holes came from a previous cosmic cycle. They might be pre-cosmic relics according to recent work... http://arxiv.org/abs/1104.3796" ...though I wonder what might lurk behind their event horizons...
 
Last edited by a moderator:
TL;DR Summary: In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect alien signals, it will further expand the radius of the so-called silence (or rather, radio silence) of the Universe. Is there any sense in this or is blissful ignorance better? In 3 years, the Square Kilometre Array (SKA) telescope (or rather, a system of telescopes) should be put into operation. In case of failure to detect...
Thread 'Could gamma-ray bursts have an intragalactic origin?'
This is indirectly evidenced by a map of the distribution of gamma-ray bursts in the night sky, made in the form of an elongated globe. And also the weakening of gamma radiation by the disk and the center of the Milky Way, which leads to anisotropy in the possibilities of observing gamma-ray bursts. My line of reasoning is as follows: 1. Gamma radiation should be absorbed to some extent by dust and other components of the interstellar medium. As a result, with an extragalactic origin, fewer...
Both have short pulses of emission and a wide spectral bandwidth, covering a wide variety of frequencies: "Fast Radio Bursts (FRBs) are detected over a wide range of radio frequencies, including frequencies around 1400 MHz, but have also been detected at lower frequencies, particularly in the 400–800 MHz range. Russian astronomers recently detected a powerful burst at 111 MHz, expanding our understanding of the FRB range. Frequency Ranges: 1400 MHz: Many of the known FRBs have been detected...
Back
Top