Bloch functions in Kronig-Penney model

  • Thread starter Thread starter joel.martens
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Functions Model
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the interpretation of Bloch's Theorem in the context of the Kronig-Penney model, specifically regarding the wavefunction of an electron in a periodic potential created by an array of square wells. Participants are exploring the implications of the solutions to the Schrödinger equation in this scenario.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to clarify the roles of the components of the Bloch function, particularly the envelope function and the periodic modulation. There are questions about how these components relate to the shapes of wavefunctions in different energy bands and the nature of the states represented by k-points in the Brillouin zone.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking to refine their understanding of the Bloch function and its implications for wavefunctions in the context of energy bands. Some guidance has been offered regarding the probability density and its dependence on the periodic charge density, but there is no explicit consensus on the interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating the complexities of the relationship between the Bloch function components and the physical interpretations of wavefunctions in a periodic potential, indicating a need for deeper exploration of these concepts.

joel.martens
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
I'm writing a report for a computer lab where we ran simulations of the wavefunction of an electron in an array of square wells as per the Kronig-Penney model and I'm just looking for some verification of my interpretation of Bloch's Theorem as it applies to the solutions of the Schrödinger equation in this case.

Homework Equations


ψ_k (x)=u_k (x)e^ikx , solution to the SE for the periodic potential.


The Attempt at a Solution


My understanding of it is that the e^ikx is the 'envelope' for the solution and takes the shape of the solution of the SE for an equivalent single well and the u_k(x) is the periodic function that modulates the wavefunction with the same periodicity of the lattice.
So for the lower energy band, is the envelope function the familiar 1/2 wave for all states in the lower band and the 1 wavelength wavfunction the envelope for all the states in the higher band?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Not sure what you are saying, but a band is made up of all the k-points in the first Brillouin zone. So you can't say a band is just 1 k-point.
 
Thats my poor explanation of the problem sorry, i get that the bands are a continuum of states from the k-points in the Brillouin zone. I was asking more about the exact meanings of the two parts of the Bloch function and how they relate to the shapes of the wavefunctions in the bands.
 
Usually you look at the probability density, which is just \left|\Psi_{nk}(x)\right|^2. So the phase factor out front disappears and you are just left with the periodic charge density \left|u_{nk}(x)\right|^2. And the shape of that depends on the potential.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
8K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
13K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K