Bloch Theory of electrical resistivity - Derivation

kanonear
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
In "Electrons and Phonons" by Ziman which you can find here, I have a problem with equation (9.5.14) on page 360 and (9.5.17) on page 361. I don't understand how from the first equation where you have double surface integral you obtain the second equation with only one integral over q.

I don't think it's a mathematical transformation, but something with physical assumptions.

Can anybody help me with that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok. I figured it out. I'll write my solution here so that it will be easy to find :).

ρ_{L}= \frac{9 π \hbar}{2e^{2}mNk_{b}T}\cdot \frac{1}{R^{2}σ^{2}}\int\int \frac{(K \cdot u)^{2}(K \cdot e)^{2}ζ(K)}{(1-e^{-h\nu /k_{b}T})(e^{h\nu /k_{b}T}-1)}\frac{dσ}{\upsilon}\frac{dσ\;'}{\upsilon\;'} =

As it is stated in the book:

(K \cdot u)^{2}=\frac{1}{3} K^{2}
(K \cdot e)^{2}= K^{2}

Of course K = k' - k , and for Normal Process we can write that K=q.

K^{2}= 2R^{2}(1-\cos ( \theta))
K\;dK= R^{2}\sin ( \theta) d\theta

In the spherical coordinates (in k space) the surface element can be written as:

d\sigma = R^{2} \sin (\theta)d\theta d\varphi

where R correspond to the Fermi Sphere radius.
Now we rewrite the equation for resistance using equations above:

ρ_{L}= \frac{9 π \hbar}{2e^{2}mNk_{b}T}\cdot \frac{1}{R^{2}σ^{2}}\int\int\int \frac{\frac{1}{3}K^{2}K^{2}ζ(K)}{(1-e^{-h\nu /k_{b}T})(e^{h\nu /k_{b}T}-1)}\frac{R^{2} \sin (\theta)d\theta d\varphi}{\upsilon}\frac{dσ\;'}{\upsilon\;'} = \frac{9 π \hbar}{2e^{2}mNk_{b}T}\cdot \frac{1}{R^{2}σ^{2}}\int \int \int \frac{\frac{1}{3}K^{4}ζ(K)}{(1-e^{-h\nu /k_{b}T})(e^{h\nu /k_{b}T}-1)}\frac{K\;dK d\varphi}{\upsilon}\frac{dσ\;'}{\upsilon\;'}

Now let us take \upsilon = \upsilon \; ' = \upsilon _{F} and K=q :

ρ_{L} = \frac{9 π \hbar}{2e^{2}mNk_{b}T}\cdot \frac{1}{R^{2}σ^{2}}\int \frac{\frac{1}{3}q^{5}ζ(K)\;dq }{(1-e^{-h\nu /k_{b}T})(e^{h\nu /k_{b}T}-1)}\frac{1}{\upsilon_{F}^{2}}\int d\varphi \int dσ\;'

Integral over d\varphi give us 2\pi, and the last integral is just \sigma.

ρ_{L} = \frac{9 π \hbar}{2e^{2}mNk_{b}T}\cdot \frac{1}{R^{2}σ^{2}}\cdot \frac{1}{3} \frac{1}{\upsilon_{F}^{2}}2\pi \sigma \int \frac{q^{5}ζ(q)\;dq }{(1-e^{-h\nu /k_{b}T})(e^{h\nu /k_{b}T}-1)}

Now we can substitute \sigma = 4\pi R^{2}:

ρ_{L} = \frac{3 π \hbar}{4e^{2}mNk_{b}T R^{4}\upsilon_{F}^{2}} \int \frac{q^{5}ζ(q)\;dq }{(1-e^{-h\nu /k_{b}T})(e^{h\nu /k_{b}T}-1)}

and that is what we were looking for :).
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Back
Top