Block hanging from spring when a second block is added

  • Thread starter Thread starter dtesselstrom
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Block Spring
Click For Summary
A block hanging from a vertical spring experiences a sag of 3.00 cm when a second identical block is added, indicating a change in equilibrium. The user initially attempted to calculate the spring constant (k) using the formula F = -ky, where F is the weight of the two blocks and y is the sag. However, the calculated oscillation frequency using T = 2π√(m/k) was incorrect. The discussion emphasizes the need to accurately determine how much the spring stretches from its natural length with the additional weight. Clarifying the relationship between the sag and the spring's properties is essential for solving the problem correctly.
dtesselstrom
Messages
29
Reaction score
0
A block hangs in equilibrium from a vertical spring. When a second identical block is added, the original block sags by 3.00 cm. It wants to know the oscillation frequency of this problem.
So far I tried solving for F=-ky with F being 2m*g and y equal to .03. I solved for k and plugged that into T=2pi sq root of m/k this however said it was wrong. Any information on how to approach this would be nice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
dtesselstrom said:
A block hangs in equilibrium from a vertical spring. When a second identical block is added, the original block sags by 3.00 cm. It wants to know the oscillation frequency of this problem.
So far I tried solving for F=-ky with F being 2m*g and y equal to .03. I solved for k and plugged that into T=2pi sq root of m/k this however said it was wrong. Any information on how to approach this would be nice.
The 3cm sag comes from adding 1m. How much do you think the spring is streteched from its natural length with the 2m hanging on it?
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K