Block-on-Block attached by String to Block in Pulley on Incline

Keena
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

The problem is shown below - but no answer was given to this, and the teacher did not plan on taking it up, since it was optional extra practice.

My attempt at a solution: http://imgur.com/DmrgMMO, my final answer was 2.76 kg.

I was wondering if this was right or wrong, and if anyone could show me the proper steps.

Thanks for your time.
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    15 KB · Views: 642
on Phys.org
Keena said:
Hi all,

The problem is shown below - but no answer was given to this, and the teacher did not plan on taking it up, since it was optional extra practice.

My attempt at a solution: http://imgur.com/DmrgMMO, my final answer was 2.76 kg.

I was wondering if this was right or wrong, and if anyone could show me the proper steps.

Thanks for your time.

attachment.php?attachmentid=67978&d=1395711617.png


Your solution for the maximum acceleration of Block C looks fine.

I haven't gone through the rest of your solution, but with that, it should be pretty straight formard to fin the force necessary to accelerate Block B & C at that value.
...
 
Keena said:
Ah, quick specific question, my calculation for the X component of the Fg for Block B+C, was done by adding up both masses.

But looking at example 3 here: http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/newtlaws/Lesson-3/Double-Trouble

Should I have just calculated X component for Fg of Block B+C with just the mass of B?
Block C is stationary with respect to Block B, so you can threat them as a single object.
 
Thanks very much.

Everything's clear to me now.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
11K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
6K
Replies
35
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K