Block on inclined plane with pulleys and friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a block on an inclined plane, pulleys, and friction. The original poster is tasked with finding the acceleration of a block, given a coefficient of kinetic friction.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to set up equations based on forces acting on the blocks, including tension and friction. They express confusion over the signs of the acceleration and whether their assumptions about the direction of motion are correct.
  • Some participants question the geometric constraints used in the equations, suggesting that the relationships between the accelerations of the blocks may be misinterpreted.
  • Others explore the implications of their assumptions about the direction of forces and accelerations, leading to discussions about the signs of the terms in their equations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights into the setup of the equations and the assumptions made. There is recognition of potential errors in the original poster's approach, but no consensus has been reached regarding the correct interpretation of the problem.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the results obtained from their calculations yield negative accelerations, prompting questions about the physical meaning of these results and whether the blocks are indeed in motion. The constraints of the problem, including the coefficient of kinetic friction, are acknowledged but not resolved.

phlstr
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


nE4Vv.png

coefficient of kinetic friction = 0.15

Find the acceleration of block a.

Homework Equations


see below

The Attempt at a Solution


http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=-200sin30%2B0.15*200cos30%2B2x%3D-200%2F32.2*a%3Bx-40%3D40%2F32.2*b%3Ba%3D0.5*b

I used x for tension and a and b for the acceleration of the blocks.

I assumed that the acceleration of block a is down the plane and so block b would go up, but the answer I got was negative! I tried assuming that block a goes up and block b goes down, but I got a negative answer again! Are the equations that I used wrong? or the blocks don't move at all?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi phlstr! :smile:

your geometric constraint b = 0.5a is wrong, it should be b = -0.5a

(look at the diagram! :wink:)
 
Hi :). But I already made the net mass*acceleration negative for A and the net force for B positive. I used the geometric constraint just for the magnitude..

and I think you mean a=0.5b. :shy:
 
Last edited:
phlstr said:
Hi :). But I already made the net mass*acceleration negative for A and the net force for B positive.

no, both equations are measuring up as positive

(we can see that eg from the fact that your x (tension) is positive both cases)

so if a increases, b decreases :wink:
 
What do you mean by measuring up as positive?
 
phlstr said:
What do you mean by measuring up as positive?

i mean uphill for A, and directly up for B
 
So these are my equations:

[itex]-200sin\left(30\right)+(0.15)(200)cos\left(30\right)+2T=-\frac{200}{32.2}a[/itex]
I use negative values for forces pointing downhill, and positive for pointing up. Since I assumed that the net force for block A is going down, I made the right side negative..

[itex]T-40=\frac{40}{32.2}b[/itex]
Negative is down and positive is up. Since block A is going downhill, then block B is accelerating upwards and the net force is upwards.

[itex]a=0.5b[/itex]
The magnitude of the acceleration of block A is half of the acceleration of block B.

This is how I understand the equations that I'm using.. Can you point where it's wrong?
 
ah, now that i see it on the same page, it does looks right :smile:

ok, i get positive times a on the LHS = a positive number on the RHS,

what did you get?
 
I plugged the equations in wolfram alpha and got
a=-0.534946 b=-1.06989, T=38.6709

I also tried using substitution and got the same for A...
and it's negative??
 
  • #10
phlstr said:
I also tried using substitution

let's see :smile:
 
  • #11
[itex]-200sin\left(30\right)+(0.15)(200)cos\left(30\right)+2T=-\frac{200}{32.2}a[/itex]
[itex]T-40=\frac{40}{32.2}b[/itex]
[itex]a=0.5b[/itex]

[itex]T=\frac{40}{32.2}b+40[/itex]
[itex]2a=b[/itex]
[itex]T=\frac{40}{32.2}2a+40[/itex]

[itex]-200sin\left(30\right)+(0.15)(200)cos\left(30\right)+2\left(\frac{40}{32.2}2a+40\right)=-\frac{200}{32.2}a[/itex]

[itex]-200sin\left(30\right)+(0.15)(200)cos\left(30\right)+\frac{160}{32.2}a+80=-\frac{200}{32.2}a[/itex]

[itex]-200sin\left(30\right)+(0.15)(200)cos\left(30\right)+80=-\frac{200}{32.2}a-\frac{160}{32.2}a[/itex]

[itex]5.980762114=-11.18012422a[/itex]

[itex]a=-0.5349459[/itex]




:smile:
 
  • #12
oh … very small and negative!

ie uphill

so if the kinetic friction is uphill, the motion would have to be uphill also, which is impossible

and if we make the kinetic friction downhill, then that +25 becomes -25, and the motion is also downhill, again impossible

so the blocks don't move

you could find the friction force F by solving the same pair of equations, with 0 on the RHS and F in the middle of the LHS :wink:
 

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
851
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K