Blood flow velocity via Doppler effect

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of the Doppler effect in measuring blood flow velocity using a Doppler flow meter with a frequency of 12 MHz. The sensor detects a beat frequency of 1.8 kHz, and the speed of sound in blood is established at 1520 m/s. The participants analyze the correct application of the Doppler effect formula, specifically the relationship between emitted and received frequencies, and the implications of the motion of the emitter and blood cells. The conclusion emphasizes the need for a more coherent understanding of the Doppler shifts involved in the measurement process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Doppler effect formula: f_r = f_e (1±v_r/v_w)/(1±v_e/v_w)
  • Familiarity with beat frequency calculations: f_b = |f_1 - f_2|
  • Knowledge of wave propagation in fluids, specifically blood
  • Basic algebra for manipulating equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Doppler effect equations in various reference frames
  • Explore the implications of frequency shifts in ultrasound applications
  • Investigate the physics of sound propagation in biological fluids
  • Learn about advanced Doppler techniques for measuring blood flow velocity
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in medical physics, biomedical engineering, and healthcare technology who are involved in the application of Doppler ultrasound for blood flow measurement.

FranzDiCoccio
Messages
350
Reaction score
43

Homework Statement


A Doppler flow meter is used to measure the speed of red blood cells.
The frequency of the apparatus is f = 12 MHz. The sensor in the apparatus measure 1.8 kHz beats between the emitted frequency and the frequency of the ultrasound reflected back by the blood cells.
The speed of sound in blood is 1520 m/s.

Homework Equations


General formula for the Doppler effect:

f_r = f_e \frac{1\pm \frac{v_r}{v_w}}{1\pm \frac{v_e}{v_w}}

where e is for "emitter", r is for "receiver" and w is for "wave", and the sign must be chosen appropriately.
EDIT: the problem assumes that everything happens in 1D, that's why I'm using this formula.Frequency of the beats between two different frequencies.

f_b = |f_1-f_2|

The Attempt at a Solution


I think this problem is a bit tricky. In fact, I suspect that the solution I was provided is correct, but its derivation may be wrong.

I think that the blood cells should be considered at rest, and the emitter/receiver should be considered in motion with the same speed as the blood. This is because I think the Doppler effect formula makes sense in the frame of reference of the medium (blood).
Then, if my assumption is correct, the frequency "received" by the blood cells is
f_r = f_e \frac{1}{1\pm\frac{v}{v_w}}
where the sign is - if the blood cells are approaching the flow meter and + otherwise. This because the emitter (flow meter) is in motion.
The blood cells reflect back the waves with the same frequency as they were received. Since the flow meters which receives the reflected waves is in motion, one gets
f_r' = f_e \frac{1\mp\frac{v}{v_w}}{1\pm\frac{v}{v_w}}
where the minus in the denominator corresponds to the plus in the numerator, and the other way round.

The equation for the beats can be inverted for v with a little algebra, which gives
v= v_w \frac{f_b }{2f_e \pm f_b}

The solution I was given is basically the same
v = \frac{f_b}{2 f_e} v_w
because the f_b term in my denominator is negligible.

However the reason provided for this solution does not convince me, because it is based on the equations
f_r = f_e (1\pm\frac{v}{v_w})
f_r' = f_e (1\mp\frac{v}{v_w})
f_b = |f_r-f_r'|

While this approach does result in the proposed solution, it does not make any sense, in my opinion.
The second Doppler shift should depend on the first, right? Not simply on the emitted frequency...
Also, why calculating the beats between the Doppler shifted frequencies?
The exercise text says that the beats is between the emitted frequency (unshifted) and the received frequency ("twice" shifted).

Thanks a lot for your help.
Franz
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you are correct. I cannot see the logic behind the provided solution.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
912
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K