Bunny-chan
- 105
- 4
The discussion revolves around a trigonometric identity presented in a book, specifically questioning the author's statements regarding the relationship between certain trigonometric functions and their absolute values.
The discussion is active, with participants questioning the reasoning behind the author's statements and seeking clarification on the relationships between the trigonometric functions. Some guidance has been offered regarding the nature of multiplication and its commutative property, but there remains a lack of consensus on the interpretation of the identity in question.
Participants express confusion over the specific trigonometric functions involved and the implications of using absolute values in the context of the problem. There is an indication that the original problem may have constraints or specific requirements that are not fully articulated in the discussion.
Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. How does it prove his statement is correct?FactChecker said:You are right, but that doesn't mean that what they say is wrong. In fact it proves that their statements are correct. They want to prove something about the absolute value, so they took the absolute value of both sides.
It's the same thing. Multiplication is commutative. They just swapped the order of the multiplication.Bunny-chan said:Sorry, I don't understand what you mean. How does it prove his statement is correct?
I wasn't wondering about the absolute values, I was confused about the fact that it should be two times the cosine, not the sine.