binzing
- 280
- 0
I just got done with "The Count of Monte Cristo (Abridged)". It's the basis of my summer project for Pre-AP English 10. It was pretty good...
I read the Hobbit years ago to my son, then followed with the LOTR trilogy.jimmysnyder said:I read The Hobbit, by Tolkien and didn't think much of it either. Then I started on the LOTR, but found it unreadable and gave up after about half of the first volume.
Astronuc said:Thanks! I just bought it.
There is this - C Courtois: Les Vandales et l'Afrique (1955) - which I found at
http://www.scaruffi.com/politics/medieval.html
and I found this
Vandals, Romans and Berbers: New Perspectives on Late Antique North Africa (Hardcover)
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0754641457/?tag=pfamazon01-20
jimmysnyder said:I just finished reading Brave New World, by Aldous Huxley. Before that I read the Iliad and the Odyssey. Next will be The Fountainhead, by Ayn Rand. I read Atlas Shrugged and didn't think much of it. But I will give her a second chance. I read Catch-22 when I was 20 or so and liked it. I don't remember having trouble getting involved in it. But I was unable to read Gravity's Rainbow, by Thomas Pynchon and gave up after about 200 pages. I'm told that the first 200 pages were written to get rid of the riff-raff reader. I read The Hobbit, by Tolkien and didn't think much of it either. Then I started on the LOTR, but found it unreadable and gave up after about half of the first volume.
arildno said:Why??
What could be more exciting than the destruction of the Roman empire??![]()
Try the library. Rand was not a native speaker of English and her writing style rots. (Neither was Nobokov and his style rocks). You read her for ideas or you toss her aside. I think most people would say that since they don't agree with her ideas, there is no point in reading her books and finding out what they are.TheStatutoryApe said:I've not read Rand yet. I fear I just won't like her. I think there is a copy of Atlas Shrugged lying around at work somewhere that I could borrow though.
Peter Heather's book is a bit dense, but it is an excellent narrative. One could consider it dense like LOTR, but it's real history.TheStatutoryApe said:I'm sure that I would find a lot of it interesting. Its just that the particular books you are mentioning mostly give me the impression of being very dense.
Can you recommend something in say comic book form? ;-p
Astronuc said:Peter Heather's book is a bit dense, but it is an excellent narrative. One could consider it dense like LOTR, but it's real history.
That's the one. It is really well written. I didn't find it dry at all. It reads like a good novel, only it is real history.TheStatutoryApe said:https://www.amazon.com/dp/0195159543/?tag=pfamazon01-20
This one? It looks like a good suggestion. I'll have to put it to my list. I'm sure my roomie will be interested as well.
I'm assuming that's the one by R.C. Zaehner. I'm not familiar with it. I have Huston Smith's book "The Religions of Man (now retitled The World's Religions)," which is pretty good.. . . I have a Barnes & Noble publication 'Encyclopedia of the World's Religions' . . .
That's the one. It was on sale so I figured I would pick it up.Astronuc said:I'm assuming that's the one by R.C. Zaehner.
An overview of some of the more prominent is good enough for me. If there are any I find particularly intriguing I think I would rather find a book specific to it. I picked up some other books that were on sale at B&N. Among them was one on the Norse mythology which unfortunately was rather skimpy. A decent summery though I guess along with some analysis.I think it's hard to find a comprehensive book on all the world's religions, particularly one balanced between east and west. Smith does a pretty good job though.
arildno said:To tempt Astronuc:
https://www.amazon.com/dp/0521325919/?tag=pfamazon01-20
Book Description
This is the first systematic study of Byzantine imperial ideology, court rhetoric and political thought after the Latin conquest of Constantinople in 1204 - in the Nicaean state (1204-1261) and during the early period of the restored empire of the Palaiologoi. The book explores Byzantine political imagination at a time of crisis when the Empire ceased to be a first-rate power in the Mediterranean. It investigates the correspondence and fissures between official political rhetoric, on the one hand, and the political ideas of lay thinkers and churchmen, on the other. Through the analysis of a wide body of sources (some of them little known or unpublished), a picture of Byzantine political thought emerges which differs significantly from the traditional one. The period saw refreshing developments in court rhetoric and political thought, some with interesting parallels in the medieval and Renaissance West, which arose in response to the new historical realities.
About the Author
Dimiter Angelov is a Research Fellow and Lecturer in the Centre for Byzantine, Ottoman and Modern Greek Studies at the University of Birmingham. He studied at Harvard University and has also taught at Western Michigan University.
Is this the text?arildno said:I'm at the moment rifling through Salvian's "On the Government of God", written in 440, and available online
At that time, the Huns were military allies with the Romans (that didn't last long..).
It contains a condemnation of how the then functioning tax system in Gaul had depredating effects, for example by driving the poorer peasants into the arms of the Bagaudae.
It also rails against Carthagian immorality, where transvestites were dominant, it seems..
That's very interesting Aildno! I am always amazed by the breadth and depth of your knowledge of history in this period. It's one of my favorites. I wish there was a way I could just plug into your brain. Marcus is another I'd love to plug into.arildno said:It seems that Bachrach wrote a book about the Alans, "The Alans in the West", an Iranian nomadic people eventually settling in Armorica, nowadays Brittany, of all places, back in the fifth century.
Apparently, the Bretons were renowned for their horsemanship, and we have references to that from both Gregory of Tours and later historians.
Thus, it seems, the future Bretons learned their skills from the Alans, or so Bachrach argues in an article I bought at jstor.
This fits very nicely with a hypothesis I had already formed when reading Ammianus, that there might be ALANIC elements in the Arthurian myths!
We know that the Arthurian cycle is mainly from Brittany, and a very interesting passage in Ammianus came to my attention:
Here, Ammianus is commenting on a ritual of commencing war among the Alans:
This cannot be done unless a SWORD HAS BEEN THRUST INTO THE GROUND.
(and presumably, dances, chants as such around the sword before retrieving it)
Could this be the historical basis for what eventually morphed into the Excalibur legend, with the true king takes the sword out of the stone (or ground)?
(Ammianus was a contemporary with Julian the Apostate, and Ammianus, who was a pagan, saw him as the greatest of Cæsars.)
Just what I need - http://www.librarything.com/groups/ancienthistory -TheStatutoryApe said:By the way here is an interesting website for bibliophiles...
http://www.librarything.com/
A hypothesis shared with others, I hear.arildno said:It seems that Bachrach wrote a book about the Alans, "The Alans in the West", an Iranian nomadic people eventually settling in Armorica, nowadays Brittany, of all places, back in the fifth century.
Apparently, the Bretons were renowned for their horsemanship, and we have references to that from both Gregory of Tours and later historians.
Thus, it seems, the future Bretons learned their skills from the Alans, or so Bachrach argues in an article I bought at jstor.This fits very nicely with a hypothesis I had already formed when reading Ammianus, that there might be ALANIC elements in the Arthurian myths!
Thanks a lot, Gokul!Gokul43201 said:A hypothesis shared with others, I hear.
Being totally illiterate, I get all my knowledge from a brilliantly slanderous show called QI: http://www.guba.com/watch/3000035114
If you don't care about the show itself, skip ahead to about 13 min, for the segment on the Alans. Apparently, Pliny the Elder (my favorite dude of all time) had a not too favorable opinion of the Alans.
That was wild! Poor Pliny the Elder, killed by Vesuvius.Gokul43201 said:Being totally illiterate, I get all my knowledge from a brilliantly slanderous show called QI: http://www.guba.com/watch/3000035114
If you don't care about the show itself, skip ahead to about 13 min, for the segment on the Alans. Apparently, Pliny the Elder (my favorite dude of all time) had a not too favorable opinion of the Alans.
I've read the book. It is a great story!Publishers Weekly said:In an unusually successful amalgam, veteran journalists Sontag and Christopher Drew combine a gripping story with admirable research to relate previously unknown information. Throughout the Cold War, the U.S. depended heavily on submarines for intelligence gathering, whether tracking Soviet missile subs, monitoring Soviet harbors and missile tests or, in some cases, retrieving lost Soviet equipment. The U.S.S.R. responded with everything from comprehensive espionage operations to depth charge attacks on particularly intrusive snoopers. The broad outlines of this clandestine confrontation are relatively familiar, but the details have largely remained secret. Although the authors have based their book largely on interviews with submariners, intelligence operatives and politicians, they recognize the possibility of distortion and back up personal accounts with an elaborate and convincing system of verification. While necessarily incomplete, the resulting work depicts what was arguably the most successful long-term, large-scale intelligence operation in American history. From captains to seamen, the participants combined technical proficiency, . . . .
Another great story. I actually exchanged emails with Coram after I read the book.A great American hero-a 20th-century warrior and military strategist who lived outside the spotlight but whose work has been enormously influential-is brought brilliantly to life in this acclaimed biography. John Boyd was the finest fighter pilot in American history. From the proving ground of the Korean War, he went on to win notoriety as the instructor who defeated-in less than 40 seconds-every pilot who challenged him. But what made Boyd a man for the ages was what happened after he left the cockpit. He transformed the way military aircraft-in particular the F-15 and F-16-were designed with his revolutionary Energy-Maneuverability Theory. . . . .
I'll read this after my wife finishes reading it. From what she described, it's quite a story.Publishers Weekly said:Starred Review. Some failures lead to phenomenal successes, and this American nurse's unsuccessful attempt to climb K2, the world's second tallest mountain, is one of them. Dangerously ill when he finished his climb in 1993, Mortenson was sheltered for seven weeks by the small Pakistani village of Korphe; in return, he promised to build the impoverished town's first school, a project that grew into the Central Asia Institute, which has since constructed more than 50 schools across rural Pakistan and Afghanistan.
Coauthor Relin recounts Mortenson's efforts in fascinating detail, presenting compelling portraits of the village elders, con artists, philanthropists, mujahideen, Taliban officials, ambitious school girls and upright Muslims Mortenson met along the way. As the book moves into the post-9/11 world, Mortenson and Relin argue that the United States must fight Islamic extremism in the region through collaborative efforts to alleviate poverty and improve access to education, especially for girls. . . .
arildno said:I haven't as yet read (or bought) the Victorian classic, Thomas Hodgkin's 8-volume "Italy and her invaders", but it is supposed to be well written.
I HAVE read extracts of Gibbon's "Decline and Fall", and his footnotes, at least, are rather juicy..
His books are all of a rather similar style so I'm not sure if you would enjoy any of the others. I only hardly remember Nueromancer (which maybe says something about it).tribdog said:Neuromancer,William Gibson-4 out of 10, I could not get into this book, it was a chore to read it
The sequal, The Anansi Boys, is quite good but not as good as American Gods in my opinion. I would recommend any of his books as well as the calaborative effort with Terry Pratchet, Good Omens. I'm even considering looking for Gaiman's Sandman comic book series, only comic to ever win the World Fantasy Award or to hit the New York Times best seller list.Trib said:American Gods, Neil Gaiman-8.5 out of 10, another author I want to read more of
TheStatutoryApe said:The sequal, The Anansi Boys, is quite good but not as good as American Gods in my opinion. I would recommend any of his books as well as the calaborative effort with Terry Pratchet, Good Omens. I'm even considering looking for Gaiman's Sandman comic book series, only comic to ever win the World Fantasy Award or to hit the New York Times best seller list.
Nope. It's entirely separate from discworld. I always describe it as "If Douglas Adams wrote the apocalypse".tribdog said:Good Omens isn't a discworld book is it? I've got 35 discworld audio books, but I don't have good omens.
from the Inside Flap/Amazon said:The Politically Incorrect Guide(TM) to Western Civilization takes on the prevailing liberal assumptions that make Western civilization the universal whipping boy for today's global problems, and introduces you to the significant events, individuals, nations, ideas, and artistic achievements that make Western civilization the greatest the world has ever known.
Well - it's only someone's opinion.TheStatutoryApe said:"...the greatest the world has ever known."?
Wow... that looks scary Astro.
Astronuc said:I've been reading "Dreams from my Father" by Barack Obama. I've had many similar observations about the world. He is very thoughtful, insightful and introspective, and I think those qualities could make him a great president. I really hope that he becomes a great president, and that he does lead the nation in a more positive direction that enables greater prosperity and security for all, not only in the US but in all other nations too.
Amazon.com Review
. . . . is a serious look at invention, rivalry, and betrayal. One of the central episodes involves Oppenheimer's too-cozy relationship with radical-left politics--he carelessly associated with Communists, even though he occupied one of the most sensitive jobs in the U.S. government during the cold war--and Teller's momentous decision to testify against him. This event is one of the most controversial in the annals of American science, and Herken tells it straight, with barely a word of editorial comment. Fans of Richard Rhodes will enjoy this triple biography, as will anybody with an interest in science, politics, and top-secret security clearances. --John J. Miller
From Publishers Weekly
The personalities of the scientists who made the nuclear bomb are the focus of this detailed, engrossing history of one of the greatest scientific discoveries of the 20th century. Relying on author interviews and primary and secondary sources, Herken (The Winning Weapons) explains the backgrounds of the three physicists who were essential to the creation of the atomic bombs dropped over Japan during WWII. But even though the author focuses on Oppenheimer, Lawrence and Teller offering both brief bios of each and depicting the sometimes-tempestuous relationships among them it's the former who garners the lion's share of his attention. "Oppie," as he was known, has long been a controversial figure for his later opposition to weapons programs and his alleged Communist links (he was stripped of his U.S. government security clearance during the McCarthy years). As Herken notes, the trial might have had a backlash, turning many scientists against U.S. defense projects for years to come. But there's no smoking gun here: Herken argues that it is unlikely that Oppenheimer, despite his strong leftist sympathies, was ever a member of the Communist Party, let alone a spy. But he nicely details the intersection between the scientific and leftist communities (particularly during the 1920s and 1930s) and the government's attempt to infiltrate these communities after the war. The book is unlikely to end the debate over Oppenheimer's past or change any minds about the balances between security needs and civil liberties but if there was ever a question that politics plays a part in science, this book washes away any doubts.
I checked out a library copy of 'The Elder Edda' by Taylor and Auden today and started reading. This volume has excerpts from various poems along with an introduction, glossary and notes. Without them, I would be as lost as you would have been without your preparation. I thought The Hobbit was OK, but I gave up on LOTR after about a third of the way into the first volume. I guess Tolkien's Middle Earth refers to the Midgard of the Edda.moe darklight said:I'm reading the Poetic Edda and I highly recommend it. Norse (vikings!) mythology and poetry is awesome; it's very imaginative and beautifully written.
I'm glad I read the Prose Edda first though, because it introduces the gods and myths without which I'd be kind of lost.
If you're a fan of Lord Of The Rings (which I can't say I am, but I might give it another chance some day) you'll probably enjoy it, as many of the ideas are inspired by these myths and stories.