Interesting finance book review: A Call for Judgment

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around a review of the book "A Call for Judgment" by Amar Bhide, as presented by Cosma Shalizi, a statistics professor with a background in physics. Participants are invited to share their thoughts on the review and the book, particularly in relation to modern finance theory and practice.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Meta-discussion

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants note the review's author, Cosma Shalizi, has a unique perspective as a physicist-turned-statistician interested in complex systems.
  • There is curiosity about the relevance of the book's discussion on finance to the audience of Physics Forums, particularly among those with quantitative backgrounds.
  • One participant suggests that the lack of replies may be due to holiday activities, indicating a potential delay in engagement.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants have not yet reached a consensus, as the discussion remains largely exploratory with no substantive replies or disagreements noted at this stage.

Contextual Notes

The discussion is limited by the absence of detailed opinions or critiques regarding the review or the book itself, as well as the lack of engagement from the community thus far.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to those in finance, statistics, or physics, particularly individuals curious about the intersection of these fields and the implications of modern finance theory.

StatGuy2000
Education Advisor
Gold Member
Messages
2,073
Reaction score
1,155
Recently, I came across this review by Cosma Shalizi, a statistics professor at Carnegie Mellon (and who was trained as a physicist, with a PhD focusing on research in statistical mechanics and complex systems), of a book titled "A Call for Judgment" by Amar Bhide, a law professor at Tufts University.

http://masi.cscs.lsa.umich.edu/~crshalizi/reviews/bhide-contra-finance.html

As someone who does not work in or specialize in finance, I'm not particularly qualified to comment on either the review or the book, but I know that there a number of quants here on this forum (I'm thinking of twofish-quant in particular), and would like to solicit opinions here on this forum.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


This is interesting. So far, this particular post had over 200 views but not one reply. Perhaps this may be due to family activities during the holidays.
 


StatGuy2000 said:
This is interesting. So far, this particular post had over 200 views but not one reply. Perhaps this may be due to family activities during the holidays.

I'm no finance wizard, but why don't you start with telling us why you feel the review is interesting :)
 


Greg Bernhardt said:
I'm no finance wizard, but why don't you start with telling us why you feel the review is interesting :)

Well, to start with, the reviewer is a physicist-turned-statistician with an interest in complex systems, and he periodically reviews books which are of professional interest to him, and I suspect also to a significant proportion of the audience for Physics Forums.

Furthermore, the book itself involves a discussion about the theory and practice of modern finance, and given that we have a number of people who are quants (and who were once trained as physicists), I would be curious to read what their opinions are regarding either the book or the reviewer's assessment of the book or its subject matter.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • Sticky
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
506K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 80 ·
3
Replies
80
Views
69K
Replies
6
Views
10K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K