Boosting Gun Efficiency: Exploring High-Velocity Bullets

  • Thread starter Thread starter sid_galt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Efficiency Gun
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on enhancing gun efficiency through the use of high-velocity bullets powered by compressed air in conjunction with gunpowder. It highlights that the pressure generated by burning propellant can significantly exceed that of any mechanical pump, suggesting that a higher pressure ratio could improve energy extraction efficiency. Theoretical calculations indicate that a pressure ratio of 18:1 yields an efficiency of 68%, which can increase to 81% with pre-compressed air at a 4:1 ratio. However, practical considerations such as thicker casings and methods for powder injection are necessary for implementation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic ballistics principles
  • Knowledge of pressure ratios in combustion
  • Familiarity with projectile design and materials
  • Experience with energy efficiency calculations
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the mechanics of ramjet propulsion for projectiles
  • Explore advanced materials for thicker bullet casings
  • Study the effects of varying gunpowder types on performance
  • Investigate methods for efficient powder injection systems
USEFUL FOR

Engineers, firearms designers, and ballistics researchers interested in optimizing projectile performance and efficiency through innovative propulsion methods.

sid_galt
Messages
502
Reaction score
1
If the gunpowder in a gun is detonated in a chamber consisting of compressed air such that the top of the chamber is formed by the bullet, wouldn't the efficiency of energy extraction from the gunpowder increase as the pressure ratio will be much higher? Would such a bullet be able to achieve much higher velocities?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Hi sidgalt!

To say the truth I have no idea about ballistics. Anyway, I thought you will find interesting this link:

http://www.aa.washington.edu/AERP/ramac/

It's great. Try to look into it and post a comment here if you want.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
The pressure generated by the burning propellant is orders of magnitude higher than you could provide with any reasonably-sized pump, so it really would help much to add that tiny bit of energy.
 
Clausius2 said:
Hi sidgalt!

To say the truth I have no idea about ballistics. Anyway, I thought you will find interesting this link:

http://www.aa.washington.edu/AERP/ramac/

It's great. Try to look into it and post a comment here if you want.

Thanks for the link Clausius2. It's fantastic. I had no idea they were using ramjets to power projectiles.

russ_watters said:
The pressure generated by the burning propellant is orders of magnitude higher than you could provide with any reasonably-sized pump, so it really would help much to add that tiny bit of energy.

Assuming detonation gives a pressure ratio of 18:1, the theoretical efficiency is 68%. If we compress the air beforehand to a pressure of say 4:1, then the theoretical efficiency rises to 81%, a 13% difference. I would say it's quite a lot. Of course the casing would also have to be 4 times thicker and a method of injecting gunpowder pellets will have to be arranged.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
It was off the head. I did a google search but I coudln't find the compression ratio generated in a gun
 
sid_galt said:
It was off the head. I did a google search but I coudln't find the compression ratio generated in a gun

It's about 50,000 atmospheres. Good luck trying to compete with that
using a pump.
 
Or you could do it the simpler way... more powder and a longer barrel...

Cheers...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
7K
  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K