Theoretical bullet max velocity?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the theoretical maximum velocity of bullets fired from conventional gunpowder-based firearms and electrochemical guns. Participants explore the factors that limit these velocities, including the mechanics of gas expansion and plasma propulsion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that the main limiting factor for gunpowder bullets is the burn speed and pressure increase of the gunpowder.
  • Another participant questions whether the principles that apply to gunpowder also apply to electrochemical guns, particularly regarding the propulsion of gas versus plasma.
  • A participant describes a method for electrochemical acceleration involving aluminum foil and plasma generation, prompting questions about the mechanics of propulsion.
  • Concerns are raised about the energy efficiency of using plasma to propel a bullet, with speculation that it may face similar limitations as gunpowder.
  • One participant recalls a claim that rifling in barrels may limit projectile velocity if the bullet fails to engage properly.
  • Another participant expresses skepticism about the military advantages of faster projectiles, suggesting that physical limits exist that may counteract potential benefits.
  • There is a discussion about the military's interest in railguns, with one participant arguing that higher velocities lead to greater energy and accuracy, potentially allowing for long-range engagements.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a variety of viewpoints regarding the limiting factors of bullet velocity, with no consensus reached on the effectiveness or advantages of different propulsion methods. The discussion remains unresolved on several technical aspects.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about the mechanics of propulsion and the efficiency of energy use in both gunpowder and electrochemical systems, but these assumptions are not fully explored or validated.

supak111
Messages
47
Reaction score
1
What is the theoretical max velocity for a gunpowder fired bullet that we use today in all guns and artillery? What is the MAIN limiting/deciding factor?

I'm guessing it would be the gunpowder burn speed/pressure increase right?


Now what about theoretical max velocity for electrochemical guns? Using electricity to produce plasma/pressure to propel the bullet...

I had a crazy idea for a electrochemical accelerator but wasn't sure if it was worth pursuing...

Thanks for any input guys.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thank you for the link. That explains the gunpowder propelled bullets, does it also apply to electrochemical gun as well since in them you are still propelling a gas (plasma) which seems to be one of the limiting factors? Or can plasma accelerate easier then an expanding gas from burning gunpowder?

No really worried about railguns, I understand those pretty well.
 
Sorry I don't know how the electrochemical guns work.
 
Simple, you have the bullet, right behind it you put a small peace of usually aluminum foil, blast the aluminum foil with a huge capacitor, current turns the foil into plasma, plasma pushes the bullet out...
 
Is it the expansion of the aluminium gas plasma that pushes the bullet out or do you use a rail gun coil acting on the plasma to push it out?

I suspect the former suffers from same limitations as explained in the link (energy needed to accelerate the gas plasma is wasted). Would the latter be very different from other rail gun that act on the bullet directly? Just thinking aloud as I'm no expert.
 
I recall reading a post, years ago, by someone in the military weapons business. Apparently, the major limit on projectile velocity is the rifling of the barrel - at some point, the bullet merely strips across them and does not engage the spiral.
 
It's not obvious to me that there is any military advantage to faster projectiles. You still have to launch the thing and there are physical limits to that: that's why you don't see destroyers with battleship-sized guns.
 
Yes its the pressure of the plasma that pushes the bullet, no coil there so it sounds like it would be the same limitation as gunpowder. Unless aluminum turns to plasma instantly but then that isn't good either since that's like using explosives to propel a bullet and that does work

Vanadium 50 said:
It's not obvious to me that there is any military advantage to faster projectiles.

Well faster projectile = more energy. Thats why the military is spending millions of $ to get a reliable railgun onto navy ships with in next 5 years... Velocity equals accuracy and insane range of the weapon. If you can take your enemy our from 100 miles away, you need far less ships on the sea. In military railguns they aren't even worried about using explosive projectiles as the projectile on its own contains so much energy at those high velocities that the explosive isn't even needed.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
49K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
9K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
16K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
16K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K