- #1

- 236

- 16

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- #1

- 236

- 16

- #2

Bystander

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 5,336

- 1,415

- #3

- 236

- 16

Actually, by 'ground', I mean something which is electrically neutral. Both of the plates are connected to some conductor which has lack of electrons (and so they are electrically positive). But the voltages of the plates are not the same.

- #4

Drakkith

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 21,733

- 5,728

- #5

- 236

- 16

Why not? It's [itex](+5V) - (+3V) = 2V[/itex]

- #6

Drakkith

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 21,733

- 5,728

- #7

- 236

- 16

In a capacitor, one of the plates is charged positive and the other negative and they are equal in quantity. But in this case, both the plates lack electron. So how can it provide negative charge or, electron?

If I assume, the plate connected to [itex]3V[/itex] is charged negative, then the plate will have a negative electric potential, and so there should be a current flow because it is connected with a voltage generator which will always keep potential to [itex]+3V[/itex].

Last edited:

- #8

Drakkith

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 21,733

- 5,728

- #9

- 236

- 16

But the point is, if the plate connected to [itex]+3V[/itex] is negatively charged, then it will have a negative electric potential. As, it is connected to a voltage generator which always keeps the voltage to [itex]+3V[/itex], there should be a current flow. So, the plate will keep losing electrons, won't it?

- #10

Drakkith

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 21,733

- 5,728

- #11

- 236

- 16

How can the plate have negative charge, but positive electric potential?

- #12

Drakkith

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 21,733

- 5,728

How can the plate have negative charge, but positive electric potential?

It doesn't have a "negative charge", it has -2 volts of potential relative to ground compared to the +5v plate. Remember that electric potential is measured between two points. Measuring the voltage between the ground and each plate gives you +3v and +5v, but measuring from one plate to the other gives you either +2v or -2v. In other words, if you measure the voltage between the plates with a volt meter, you'll get either +2v or -2v depending on how you place the leads. Switching them around will cause current to flow the other way through the voltmeter and it will read the voltage a being the opposite sign.

- #13

- 236

- 16

So, you are saying, both the plates will have positive charges?It doesn't have a "negative charge", it has -2 volts of potential relative to ground compared to the +5v plate. Remember that electric potential is measured between two points. Measuring the voltage between the ground and each plate gives you +3v and +5v, but measuring from one plate to the other gives you either +2v or -2v. In other words, if you measure the voltage between the plates with a volt meter, you'll get either +2v or -2v depending on how you place the leads. Switching them around will cause current to flow the other way through the voltmeter and it will read the voltage a being the opposite sign.

- #14

Drakkith

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 21,733

- 5,728

So, you are saying, both the plates will have positive charges?

Relative to ground, yes.

- #15

anorlunda

Staff Emeritus

- 10,429

- 7,651

Absolute potentials don't matter, only relative potentials. You could label both plates as +5 +3 or +1005 +1003 or -1005 -1003, and the result is the same.

Zero volts, is an arbitrary choice. We normally choose "ground" as zero volts becasuse it is natural and convenient. But other choices for zero work just as well.

An "uncharged object" has the same number of electrons as protons. But even an uncharged object can have a plus or minus potential difference between it and some other object.

Think relative, not absolute voltage. Balls roll down a ramp the same if the ramp is at the top of a mountain or at the bottom of a valley, as long as one end of the ramp is at a height higher

- #16

CWatters

Science Advisor

Homework Helper

Gold Member

- 10,541

- 2,314

- #17

- 236

- 16

Then, what it would be in this case as I mentioned in post #1. My question is in the point that Drakkith said both the charges are positive.

Absolute potentials don't matter, only relative potentials. You could label both plates as +5 +3 or +1005 +1003 or -1005 -1003, and the result is the same.

Zero volts, is an arbitrary choice. We normally choose "ground" as zero volts becasuse it is natural and convenient. But other choices for zero work just as well.

An "uncharged object" has the same number of electrons as protons. But even an uncharged object can have a plus or minus potential difference between it and some other object.

Think relative, not absolute voltage. Balls roll down a ramp the same if the ramp is at the top of a mountain or at the bottom of a valley, as long as one end of the ramp is at a height higherrelativeto the other end.

Relative to ground, yes.

- #18

anorlunda

Staff Emeritus

- 10,429

- 7,651

Look at all the responses so far. They are all telling you the same thing.

- #19

Drakkith

Staff Emeritus

Science Advisor

- 21,733

- 5,728

In the typical situation (which is most commonly described in text books), one of the plate is charged [itex]+Q[/itex] and the other [itex]-Q[/itex]; If the potential difference is [itex]V[/itex], then the capacitance is defined as [itex]C = \frac{Q}{V}[/itex].

Then, what it would be in this case as I mentioned in post #1. My question is in the point that Drakkith said both the charges are positive.

Use 2 volts as the voltage in the equation and you'll come out with the right answer.

Share: