Bound surface charge on a linear dielectric half-cylinder

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on the application of Gauss's law to determine the electric displacement field (D) in a linear dielectric half-cylinder. The participants confirm that sufficient symmetry is necessary to utilize Gauss's law effectively, and they clarify that the condition of χe << 1 allows for first-order approximations in polarization (P). The derived expression for P is P ≈ χeλ/(2πr), which is crucial for solving the problem. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding boundary value problems and the implications of dielectric properties in electrostatics.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Gauss's law for electric displacement
  • Familiarity with linear dielectric materials and their properties
  • Knowledge of polarization in dielectrics
  • Basic concepts of electrostatics and symmetry in electric fields
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and applications of Gauss's law in electrostatics
  • Learn about linear dielectric materials and their behavior under electric fields
  • Explore boundary value problems in electrostatics
  • Investigate the implications of small susceptibility (χe << 1) in dielectric theory
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on electrostatics, dielectric materials, and boundary value problems in electromagnetism.

Daniel Sellers
Messages
117
Reaction score
17

Homework Statement


Problem statement in attached photo. This is an ungraded assigned problem which I am using to study for an exam, so I don't need the whole solution just help with a couple of points I am confused about.

One: Part d) is really important to how I will answer part b). If we can use Gauss's law to find D then part b) should be very easy. If we can't then I suppose I will have to use boundary values to solve for P somehow in order to find the bound charges.

I don't see any reason why we shouldn't be able to, but one (very flawed) online solution said we could not, and the fact that we are asked the question makes me nervous about proceeding this way, so I wanted to ask some of the critical experts that frequent this forum.

Two: Why is the fact Xe << 1 relevant? This also seems to point me towards using boundary value equations to solve the problem, but I'm simply not familiar enough with this material yet to confidently set up the problem.

Homework Equations



P = ε0χeE

Gauss's law for electric displacement?

D = ε0E + P = εE

The Attempt at a Solution



I am fairly confident that I have solved part a) correctly and that I can solve the rest if the above points are clarified
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2018-11-28 at 10.09.37 PM.png
    Screen Shot 2018-11-28 at 10.09.37 PM.png
    45.3 KB · Views: 730
Physics news on Phys.org
Daniel Sellers said:

Homework Statement


One: Part d) is really important to how I will answer part b). If we can use Gauss's law to find D then part b) should be very easy. If we can't then I suppose I will have to use boundary values to solve for P somehow in order to find the bound charges.

I don't see any reason why we shouldn't be able to...

In order to use Gauss' law, there needs to be enough symmetry so that there will exist a particular shape of the Gaussian surface that will allow you to simplify ##\oint \mathbf{D \cdot da}##. So, think about whether there is sufficient symmetry in this problem.

Two: Why is the fact Xe << 1 relevant?
This will allow you to use approximations in which you only need to be accurate to first order in ##\chi_e##. For example, it should be easy to find an expression for the polarization ##\mathbf{P}## that is accurate to first order in ##\chi_e## if you know ##\mathbf{E}## due to the line charge.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Daniel Sellers
When considering the free charge only, we have cylindrical symmetry, but that symmetry does not apply to the entire problem. So for now I will abandon using Gauss's law.

As for χe, assuming that it is very small let's us say that ε ≈ ε0. This would suggest that the electric field in the dielectric is approximately the field we would see from the charged wire alone.

Then P ≈ χeλ/(2πr) in the radial direction.

Is this close to what you meant?
 
Daniel Sellers said:
When considering the free charge only, we have cylindrical symmetry, but that symmetry does not apply to the entire problem. So for now I will abandon using Gauss's law.
Right.

As for χe, assuming that it is very small let's us say that ε ≈ ε0. This would suggest that the electric field in the dielectric is approximately the field we would see from the charged wire alone.

Then P ≈ χeλ/(2πr) in the radial direction.

Is this close to what you meant?
Yes, exactly what I meant. :oldsmile:
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Daniel Sellers
Terrific! Back to practicing electrostatics problems then.

Thanks for your help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K