Boundary between discrete&continous

  • Thread starter Thread starter cheungyl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Boundary
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the distinction between discrete and continuous phenomena, particularly in the context of physics and mathematics. Discrete elements are characterized by finite sets, while continuous elements involve infinite processes, as illustrated by numbers like pi and Euler's e, which require infinite sums for exact representation. The conversation touches on the concept of transitions between these two states and whether such transitions can be empirically observed. Additionally, continuity is linked to limiting processes, including differentiation and integration. Overall, the boundary between discrete and continuous remains a complex topic with ongoing mathematical exploration.
cheungyl
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
what is the real boundary(or difference) between discrete&continous(as the title)? my major is physics and i find that scientists are dealing with the different treatment to these two kinds of phenomenons, but what is the real boundary? by this i mean what they actually are and how they ARE DIFFERENT from each other? we know that there is something like a transition,but will transitions really be found? I consider this a math problem so i write it here. is any mathematician working with this? (forgive my poor english)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I am not an expert on this subject, but probably the best way to describe how they are different (in terms of elementary math) is to consider a number like pi or Euler's e or the square root of 2. These numbers cannot be expressed in terms of a finite set of other numbers. You need an infinite sum of numbers to express it in exact terms. Without an infinite set of terms, you can only produce an approximation.

There are definitely others, but finite vs infinite is perhaps the easiest analogy.

Surely some one can chime in about Cantor's uncountability proof.
 
i know what u mean. Discrete in physics is born from infinity inf maths. thank u !
 
Personally, I would say that continuous mathematics has to do with limiting processes. Continuity, limits of sequences, differentiation, integrals-- these all have to do with limiting processes, one way or another.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top