Boundary conditions on D-Branes

wam_mi
Messages
78
Reaction score
1
Hi there,

I recently read that the equations of motion for an classical open string naturally give rise to two boundary conditions, namely Dirichlet and Neumann boundary conditions.

(i) Could someone explain to me what do these boundary conditions physically mean, in particular for open string endpoints attached to some objects say D-branes?

(ii) Which boundary condition fixes/forces the open string to live on the brane? Which one allows open strings to move only in the free spatial dimensions of the brane?

(iii) In superstring theory, we have strings that live in 10 dimensions, in order for the theory to be Lorentz invariant. Does that mean we have to compactify 6 extra spatial dimensions? If so, how do we do that? Why do they curl up in such format?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
I'm trying to understand the relationship between the Higgs mechanism and the concept of inertia. The Higgs field gives fundamental particles their rest mass, but it doesn't seem to directly explain why a massive object resists acceleration (inertia). My question is: How does the Standard Model account for inertia? Is it simply taken as a given property of mass, or is there a deeper connection to the vacuum structure? Furthermore, how does the Higgs mechanism relate to broader concepts like...
Back
Top