Box of primes over l V X a l ^2

  • Thread starter Thread starter maysenator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Box Primes
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the torsion of the space curve defined by the parametric equations r(t) = (3sint)i + (3cost)j + 4tk. The correct formula for torsion is t = -dB/ds N, where B is the binormal vector and N is the normal vector. The user initially miscalculated the torsion as -4 instead of the correct value of -4/25 due to overlooking the relationship between dt/ds and ds/dt. This highlights the importance of careful application of definitions in vector calculus.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically torsion and curvature
  • Familiarity with parametric equations and their derivatives
  • Knowledge of the Frenet-Serret formulas
  • Proficiency in calculating binormal and normal vectors
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Frenet-Serret formulas in detail
  • Learn how to derive torsion and curvature from parametric equations
  • Practice calculating binormal and normal vectors for various space curves
  • Explore the implications of torsion in the context of 3D geometry
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with space curves and need to understand torsion and curvature calculations.

maysenator
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
"box of primes" over l V X a l ^2

Homework Statement



Find B, and t for these space curves (t = torsion)

r(t) = (3sint)i + (3cost)j + 4tk



Homework Equations



Ok, so in my textbook i have two different equations to find the answer to this.

the "box of primes" over l V X a l ^2 method which I am NOT ALLOWED to use.

i am supposed to get torsion using t = -dB/ds N

When i use the latter, i keep getting -4, but with the long definition i can get -4/25 (the right answer)




The Attempt at a Solution



I calculate -dB/ds as (4sinti + 4costj) and N (-sint - cost)

im a little confused and getting lost in all the different definitions of everything!

anyone care to shed a little light thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


i figured it out, only a small mistake

for anyone who may encounter this exact scenario

i was forgetting dt/ds as 1/lvl where as ds/dt is mag v

small dumb error
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
7K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K