Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the conditions for Bragg reflections in hexagonal close-packed (hcp) crystal lattices, particularly focusing on how these conditions change when altering the size of the unit cell. Participants explore theoretical implications, mathematical relationships, and the impact of unit cell size on reflection conditions.
Discussion Character
- Technical explanation
- Debate/contested
Main Points Raised
- One participant states that for hcp lattices, forbidden reflections are characterized by the condition h+2k=3n and l=odd, questioning if this changes when the unit cell is doubled.
- Another participant argues that doubling the unit cell does not change the conditions for forbidden reflections, maintaining that h+2k=3n and l=odd remain valid.
- A different participant suggests that while the conditions for forbidden reflections remain unchanged, the intensity of Bragg peaks may increase due to the presence of more atoms in the larger unit cell.
- One participant introduces the concept of covariant and contravariant indices, explaining how Miller indices change with the unit cell size, asserting that the same planes are represented by different indices when the cell is altered.
- Another participant emphasizes that Bragg reflection conditions apply to an infinite crystal lattice and that changing the unit cell size should not affect the peak positions, although some indices might change.
- There is a side discussion regarding the use of non-English references, with one participant questioning the inclusion of French sources in the forum.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
Participants express differing views on how the conditions for Bragg reflections are affected by changes in the unit cell size. There is no consensus on whether the conditions for forbidden reflections change or remain the same, indicating ongoing debate.
Contextual Notes
Participants reference various mathematical relationships and concepts related to Miller indices and crystal structures, but the discussion does not resolve the implications of these relationships on Bragg reflections definitively.