(Bravais?) lattice with one angle equal 90

  • Thread starter Thread starter donali_mambo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Angle Lattice
donali_mambo
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I have seen in some books that the triclinic bravais lattice ( a≠b≠c , α≠β≠γ ) excludes explicitly the option that one angle equal 90°. For instance 90°≠α≠β≠γ=90°.

If I got the definition of α, β and γ correctly, it would be a primitive cell with a pair of parallel faces as rectangles, and rhoumbuses in the other two pairs.

The question is: Why this lattice is not included in the bravais lattices? Is possible to redefine the vectors, such that they turn into one of the Bravais lattices?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A lattice with just one angle at 90 deg does not have a special symmetry (unlike a monoclinic lattice with two 90 deg angles).

Therefore the 90deg does not have any significance and would only be "accidental" rather than locked by the appearance of a symmetry operation.

You can see this from looking at the point groups for the triclinic and monoclinic space groups: As soon as
there is a 2-fold rotation axis or mirror plane or both you are in the monoclinic lattice with two 90deg angles.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_space_groups
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...
Hi. I have got question as in title. How can idea of instantaneous dipole moment for atoms like, for example hydrogen be consistent with idea of orbitals? At my level of knowledge London dispersion forces are derived taking into account Bohr model of atom. But we know today that this model is not correct. If it would be correct I understand that at each time electron is at some point at radius at some angle and there is dipole moment at this time from nucleus to electron at orbit. But how...
Back
Top