Solid State: Diamond lattice and scattering

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a homework problem related to scattering angles and their consistency with a diamond lattice structure in solid state physics. Participants explore the application of Laue's Law and the construction of reciprocal lattice vectors, focusing on the mathematical relationships involved in scattering phenomena.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • The initial poster outlines the use of Laue's Law and conservation of energy to relate scattering angles to the diamond lattice structure.
  • They derive the relationship |G| = 2 |k| Sin[theta / 2] and calculate ratios of the G values for the given angles.
  • The poster expresses uncertainty about constructing the G vectors due to a lack of knowledge about the coefficients for the diamond lattice.
  • Another participant confirms the ratio for G_1/G_2 but disagrees on the value for G_3/G_2, suggesting that the coefficients v_1, v_2, and v_3 can take on integer values.
  • A suggestion is made to use a spreadsheet or programming tool to compute the G values and their ratios for further clarity.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There is no consensus on the values of G_3/G_2, indicating a disagreement on the calculations or assumptions involved. Participants are exploring different approaches to the problem without reaching a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the need for clarity on the coefficients for the diamond lattice and the construction of reciprocal lattice vectors, which remain unresolved. The initial poster's approach relies on assumptions about the lattice structure that may require further validation.

barrinmw
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
I have the following homework question I am working on.

I am given three scattering angles: 42.8, 73.2, 89. (in degrees) without the wavelength of the light used. I am to show that these are consistent with a diamond lattice.

I started with Laue's Law: delta(k) = G and according to the professor in this instance, I am only worried about magnitudes.

By conservation of energy I know |k| = |k'|

This led me to |G| = 2 |k| Sin[theta / 2] where |k| = 2 pi / lambda

Now, if I take the ratios of |G_1|, |G_2|, |G_3| I get:

|G_2| / |G_1| = 1.63; |G_3| / |G_2| = 1.68

To get G, I started with the lattice vectors of the primitive cell of diamond which I believe are the same lattice vectors of the primitive cell of an FCC lattice.

So a_1 = (1/2) a (yhat + zhat); a_2 = (1/2) a (xhat + zhat); a_3 = (1/2) a (xhat + yhat)

I form the reciprocal lattice basis vectors from these.

b_1 = (2 pi / a) (-xhat + yhat + zhat); b_1 = (2 pi / a) (xhat + yhat - zhat); b_1 = (2 pi / a) (xhat - yhat + zhat)

Now one problem is, that I don't know how to construct the G's from this since I don't know how to find the coefficients for the diamond lattice. I know that G = v_1 * b_1 + v_2 * b_2 + v_2 * b_2 but in the end I know that |G| should equal (2 pi / a) Sqrt( v_1^2 + v_2^2 + v_3^2)

Any help would be appreciated, once I get this I can answer the next part of the question where he gives me the wavelength of the x-rays and show that "a" is that for carbon diamond lattice.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe this question is more apt for the advanced physics homework forum.
 
I can try there, I figured here because this is from an Intro to Solid State course.
 
You are doing fine. I get the same value for G_1/G_2, but not for G_3/G_2.

Since you are using a primitive unit cell for the diamond lattice, your v_1, v_2 and v_3 can be any integer, 0,+/-1, +/-2,...

Try using an Exel spreadsheet or python program to calculate the first few G and their ratios.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
6K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K