Breaking Bonds in Space: Understanding UV Radiation's Effects on Covalent Bonds

  • Thread starter Thread starter ania 5555
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Space
AI Thread Summary
UV radiation in space can break various covalent bonds, including O-O, N-N, C-N, C-C, C-O, and double pi bonds like C=C. The discussion includes a calculation of the rate of Kapton film loss due to atomic oxygen, estimating that with a flux of 2.5 x 10^20 atoms/cm²/s and a reaction efficiency of 3.04 x 10^-24 cm³ per AO, the film's thickness will diminish at a specific rate. Additionally, the time for a 1m² window to be covered by O2 at 300 km altitude is queried, emphasizing the need for a detailed attempt at solving the problem before receiving assistance. The forum encourages separate threads for each question to avoid confusion. Overall, the conversation focuses on the effects of UV radiation and atomic oxygen on materials in space.
ania 5555
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Please can you help me with these question;

1)Which bonds can be broken by UV radiation in space?

I've done it but I'm not sure if this is correct.
Covalent bond can be broken by UV radiation in space such as; O-O, N-N, C-N, C-C,
C-O, and double pi bond C=C

2)Consider an area (A) of Kapton that is 1cm2. Assume (i) that the flux of AOs (F) is 2.5 x 1020 atoms/cm2/s and (ii) that 3.04 x 10-24 cm3 Kapton is removed per AO (RE: reaction efficiency). Then the rate of loss of film thickness (x) (- dx/dt=A x F x RE) is (3.5x1020 AO/cm2/s) x (3.04 x 10-24 cm3/ AO). What is the rate of Kapton film loss in space? If the film is 1cm thick, how long will it last attack by AOs if the rate remains constant?
AO- atomic oxygen

3)If the rate of adsorption (dθ/dt) is kax p02 x (1-θ) exp (-Ea/RT) what is the time for a 1m2 window to be covered by O2 at an altitude of 300km above the Earth’s surface?

4)Suggest one object that would be better produced in space than on Earth??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF :smile:

You'll have to show an attempt at solving HW problems before receiving help (forum policy).

Also, it's better to make a separate thread for each question. If we had a running discussion involving 4 separate problems in one thread, it could get pretty confusing as to who is talking about which problem.
 


1) If the rate of adsorption (dθ/dt) is kax p02 x (1-θ) exp (-Ea/RT) what is the time for a 1m2 window to be covered by O2 at an altitude of 300km above the Earth’s surface?
 
surrey physical haha
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
9K
Back
Top