News Breaking Down the 2016 POTUS Race Contenders & Issues

[Evo]

Us oldsters remember well. I saw it on the news. Am I a good source?

No.

 

[m k]

You have a great humour.

 

[mheslep]

I suggest read where he stands on the issues, he scares the heck out of me...

On gay marriage Gov. Pence is not significantly different from Obama in '08, and Pence is similar to, say, Reagan on abortion. I understand you disagree with these positions, but do you actually find them frightening? That is, were they frightening when held Obama or Reagan?

 

[mheslep]

... Since 1857, they've only endorsed two presidential candidates, Abraham Lincoln (1860) and Lyndon Johnson (1964).

Given they were wrong about Goldwater, The Atlantic is 1-1.

 

[Evo]

On gay marriage Gov. Pence is not significantly different from Obama in '08, and Pence is similar to, say, Reagan on abortion. I understand you disagree with these positions, but do you actually find them frightening? That is, were they frightening when held Obama or Reagan?

Yes. And Pence goes even further. You may not find his homophobia and the defunding of Planned Parenthood and such things scary, I do. I disagree with probably everything on his "on the issues" page. It's not just "gay marriage", he backed allowing companies to discriminate against hiring gays, he is against laws against hate crimes.

I don't intend to go off topic, but I was not a fan of Obama when he first started campaining, Gokul kept badgering me to like him, if it hadn't been for Palin, I might have voted for McCain, I don't know. I voted against Gore. But let's stay on topic.

 

[mheslep]

Yes. And Pence goes even further. You may not find his homophobia and the defunding of Planned Parenthood and such things scary, I do. I disagree with probably everything on his "on the issues" page.

I don't intend to go off topic, but I was not a fan of Obama when he first started campaining, Gokul kept badgering me to like him, if it hadn't been for Palin, I might have voted for McCain, I don't know. I voted against Gore. But let's stay on topic.

I disagree with Pence on some of those issues too. I don't know why disagreement must become fear that provokes name calling, when the same gay marriage issue with Obama some years ago provoked a benign "not a fan" response, but now with Pence on the same issue he's called scary and homophobic.

BTW, that HuffPo piece from Jerry "Old Guy" Bowles is incorrect on the blocked Indiana abortion law. The law did not attempt "...banning abortion even in cases ..." [italics mine] as Bowles states, implying all abortion is banned, even in extreme cases. Rather, the law attempted to ban abortion solely because of the fetus particulars, like sex, race, and disability.

 

[Evo]

but now with Pence on the same issue he's called scary and homophobic.

It's due to his other actions that I mentioned, as I said not just gay marriage. but much more important issues.

he backed allowing companies to discriminate against hiring gays, he is against laws against hate crimes.

http://www.ontheissues.org/IN/Mike_Pence.htm

See Mike Pence on "Civil Rights" if you missed it the first time I posted it, I will not keep posting it, so bookmark it if you have to.

 

[Astronuc]

George Washington was a real estate developer, and lost a lot money in some of his projects.
http://www.candocanal.org/articles/washington.html
Also was known for fierce temper, could swear a blue streak when roused.

A contemporary real estate developer like Trump is very different from one 2 centuries. Furthermore, Trump is no George Washington. Did Washington lose his own money, likely, or borrow heavily from others and lose money of others? Did Washington fail to pay taxes, or rather find ways not to pay taxes to the government?

I think Washington served the nation in ways that Trump never will, or never would.

 

[TurtleMeister]

Did Washington fail to pay taxes, or rather find ways not to pay taxes to the government?

If Trump did not do anything illegal concerning his taxes then I don't understand why it should be an issue. Shouldn't the issue be the tax code itself?

 

[Astronuc]

If Trump did not do anything illegal concerning his taxes then I don't understand why it should be an issue. Shouldn't the issue be the tax code itself?

The tax code is certainly an issue. Is there any belief or evidence to suggest either candidate will encourage Congress to improve the tax code?

Trump has mentioned more tax cuts. Clinton had mentioned increased taxes. Apparently both are comfortable with ongoing deficits.

Is Trump simply not mentioning that he will cut expenditures on certain groups?

In the case of Trumps taxes, he talks about his responsibility to investors. However, he has lost investors money, failed to repay bank loans, failed to pay contractors, . . . .

I'll have to find some discussions I heard about his taxes and business practices, and the comments were rather negative.

 

[Astronuc]

Gary Johnson struggles once more on naming a foreign leader. Hint: The last three are Kim.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/gary-joh...orth-koreas-leader-kim-jong-un-153924294.html

In an http://hsrd.yahoo.com/RV=1/RE=1477014691/RH=aHNyZC55YWhvby5jb20-/RB=/RU=aHR0cDovL3d3dy5ueXRpbWVzLmNvbS8yMDE2LzEwLzA2L3VzL3BvbGl0aWNzL2dhcnktam9obnNvbi1jYW1wYWlnbi5odG1sAA--/RS=%5EADA627eJMZ63ORS6W0OJiAzviyRvcc- , the New York Times asked Johnson, a former governor of New Mexico, if he knew the name of North Korea’s leader.

“I do,” the third-party candidate replied.

“You want me to name” the person, he continued, before adding, “Really.” Johnson ultimately declined to provide a name.
. . .
In early September, Johnson was widely ridiculed after drawing a blank on “Morning Joe” when asked about Aleppo, the most populous city in Syria and the epicenter of the ongoing refugee crisis.

I would certainly expect someone running for POTUS to know some of the world leaders with whom he or she will have to deal.

 

[Vanadium 50]

Did Washington lose his own money, likely, or borrow heavily from others and lose money of others? Did Washington fail to pay taxes, or rather find ways not to pay taxes to the government?

Actually, he sort of did. He took no salary as general of the Continental Army, asking only that his expenses be paid. In 1970, Marvin Kitman published George Washington's Expense Account, which is a hoot. Washington's expenses - including loans to friends that were never repaid were 30x a general's salary. Not exactly the same, but not exactly kosher either.

Given they were wrong about Goldwater

"In your heart, you know he's right" - Goldwater campaign slogan.
"In your guts you know he's nuts." - Variation on the above

 

[Astronuc]

Interesting views on Donald Trump and the parties from various supporters.

GOP strategist Scott Miller is also betting on Trump. Miller says, "George Bernard Shaw said that all progress is accomplished through unreasonable people, and Donald Trump is probably as unreasonable as they come."

Voters Drawn To Donald Trump In Florida Panhandle
http://www.npr.org/2016/10/06/496911566/voters-drawn-to-donald-trump-in-florida-panhandle

I can appreciate folks frustrations, but Trump is not the answer.

 

[HossamCFD]

Gary Johnson struggles once more on naming a foreign leader. Hint: The last three are Kim.

I can't help but wonder how would Trump fare under similar specific questioning. Something tells me that there might be plenty of 'Aleppo moments' there if journalists were looking for them.

 

[Astronuc]

Trump would probably also be oblivious of world leaders outside the US, although hopefully he'd remember the president of Mexico, Enrique Peña Nieto, whom he recently visited.

I could understand Johnson not admiring any world leader, or not knowing many or most of them, but I would hope he'd have some idea of who the world leaders are. George W. Bush had trouble identifying world leaders before assuming the presidency, although he did acknowledge Saddam Hussein.

It certainly does seem hard to identify admirable world leaders these days. Any candidates? Perhaps a topic for another thread.

 

[russ_watters]

Did Washington fail to pay taxes, or rather find ways not to pay taxes to the government?

Intentionally misleading word choice aside, I would certainly expect - even hope - a smart man like Washington would have taken advantage of all the deductions and legal shelters available to him in order to legally "fail to pay taxes". Wouldn't you? Don't you?

 

[Astronuc]

Intentionally misleading word choice aside, I would certainly expect - even hope - a smart man like Washington would have taken advantage of all the deductions and legal shelters available to him in order to legally "fail to pay taxes". Wouldn't you? Don't you?

It's more of a rhetorical question; no misleading choice of words. I don't take advantage of all deductions and legal shelters. My income tax rate is about 15% (including deferred income) with another 1.4% to Medicare/Medicaid and 6.1% to SS. While I take some deductions (e.g., mortgage, standard, . . .), there are charitable donations and business expenses that I don't use as deductions.

As I understand Trump's ~$916 million losses, it was not out of pocket (i.e., his money), but rather mostly borrowed money (or otherwise other peoples' monies).

 

[russ_watters]

It's more of a rhetorical question; no misleading choice of words.

I'll be explicit: "Fail to pay..." is roughly the legal definition of tax evasion. With the qualifier that came after, the phrase is incorrect and the sentence as a whole is self-contradictory.

I don't take advantage of all deductions and legal shelters. My income tax rate is about...

Fair enough; for me also it is a question of cost/benefit. I have in the past taken deductions for home office equipment, but it is a pain to itemize for a few dollars, so I don't always do it. But if the stakes were tens or hundreds of thousands, I would.

Plausible scenario: You buy a decent amount of stock -- whatever value that is for you; a thousand, or a hundred thousand in a small pharma company. Eleven months later it gets shut down by the FDA and the stock tanks. You think you want out, but maybe the stock will recover a little (not generally good to sell instantly after bad news because people oversell). Do you sell now or wait another month?

You probably sell now because that's an income loss and if you wait a month it will be a capital loss and you'll be able to take a bigger tax deduction on the income loss.

Is that tax avoision (tm)? Absolutely! "Failure to pay..."? Certainly not.

 

[russ_watters]

I can't help but wonder how would Trump fare under similar specific questioning. Something tells me that there might be plenty of 'Aleppo moments' there if journalists were looking for them.

Journalists don't need to ask him such questions or perhaps can't because he short-circuits (credit to Hillary for inventing the term) the questions he is asked. Take his "I know more about ISIS than the generals" statement and apply it to this question and you'll have his likely answer.

 

[Astronuc]

I wasn't distinguishing between avoidance and evasion, but your point is taken. Both are intentional acts, one legal and the other not, of course.

I was thinking more in terms of civic duty.

I'll have to read Kitman's book about Washington's expenses.

Fair enough; for me also it is a question of cost/benefit. I have in the past taken deductions for home office equipment, but it is a pain to itemize for a few dollars, so I don't always do it. But if the stakes were tens or hundreds of thousands, I would.

Same here.

 

[Kevin McHugh]

[
UOTE="russ_watters, post: 5587062, member: 142"]Intentionally misleading word choice aside, I would certainly expect - even hope - a smart man like Washington would have taken advantage of all the deductions and legal shelters available to him in order to legally "fail to pay taxes". Wouldn't you? Don't you?[/QUOTE]

It is every Americans citizens' moral obligation to pay the least amount of income tax required by law. If you are feeling particularly altruistic, you may pay more. However the government doesn't spend money responsibly, so you might be better off donating to charity.

 

[SW VandeCarr]

The Russian government has sent a formal complaint to the UN for the criticism of Donald Trump by a UN human rights official.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/un-criticism-of-trump-prompts-russian-response-229287

 

[Greg Bernhardt]

I really can't imagine any women voting for Trump after this latest story with his hot mic in 2005. If you want to hear it, Google for it. It's NSFW.

 

[mheslep]

Did Washington fail to pay taxes, or rather find ways not to pay taxes to the government

You'll recall that the scoflaws prior to the revolution went to great lengths to refuse to pay taxes on imports from Great Britain. Tea, etc. After establishment of the US, no US income tax was collected for the first 130 years or so. Also, aside from the civil war, the spending of the US government never exceeded 4% of US GDP from 1792 until WWI. Now federal spending approaches 25% of GDP. Total state, local, and federal almost 40%. The point being, that there was no leviathan government collecting enough tax to motivate many to avoid it. As you say, things were different back then, especially the size of government.
http://www.usgovernmentspending.com/spending_chart_1792_2010USp_17s1li011mcn_F0t

 

[mheslep]

The Russian government has sent a formal complaint to the UN for the criticism of Donald Trump by a UN human rights official.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/un-criticism-of-trump-prompts-russian-response-229287

Not just Trump. That UN diplomat, Prince Zeid Ra’ad Al-Hussein of Jordan, decided to use his diplomatic passport to speak in Cleveland about the US election, and earlier also unloaded on political leaders in half a dozen other countries. Not among the targets: any of the middle eastern totalitarian governments. How does he find the time in between invited speeches from Hollywood movie stars at the UN (this year Leo DiCaprio, Emma Watson).

...Zeid also criticized by name the pro-Brexit head of the U.K. Independence Party, Nigel Farage, who appeared with Trump at an August rally; Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico; Austrian presidential candidate Norbert Hofer; French nationalist leader Marine Le Pen; Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban; and Czech President Milos Zeman.

 

[mheslep]

...
I can appreciate folks frustrations, but Trump is not the answer.

If Clinton was built in such a way as to have said something like that, instead of her all-is-well except for the "deplorable" Americans narative, she'd be 20 points ahead. But she is not built in such a way.

 

[olivermsun]

The thing is, the context seems to describe a dichotomy:

"You know, to just be grossly generalistic, you could put half of Trump's supporters into what I call the basket of deplorables. Right? The racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic — you name it. And unfortunately there are people like that. And he has lifted them up...

"But the other basket, the other basket, and I know because I see friends from all over America here. I see friends from Florida and Georgia and South Carolina and Texas, as well as you know New York and California. But that other basket of people who are people who feel that government has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and they are just desperate for change."

So, doesn't the listener get to choose which basket they think they're in?

 

[Astronuc]

It's just gets stranger -
Bill Weld Pivots From Helping Gary Johnson to Harming Donald Trump
The Libertarian vice presidential nominee hints he may focus on rebuilding the Republican party after the election.
http://www.usnews.com/news/articles...-helping-gary-johnson-to-harming-donald-trump

I'd rather have Bill Weld at the top of that ticket.

I'm listening to Gary Johnson talking with Katie Couric, and for a change, he sounded pretty reasonable. I think he's been doing his homework, or at least he's thinking about the details. I finished listening to the interview, and Johnson is thoughtful and mostly reasonable, although I don't necessarily agree with him on all points.
https://www.yahoo.com/katiecouric/2...rm-his-party-and-the-2016-race-195136143.html

And it just seems to get worse. Trump's shocking crude comments on women leave him reeling
https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-clinton-campaigns-watch-matthews-impact-fla-072835319--election.html

 

[Astronuc]

The thing is, the context seems to describe a dichotomy:

Clinton could have chosen her words more carefully. If she mentioned 'half', rather than those who are "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic", then she's writing off many people. Clinton could have simply acknowledged those who feel that government has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and they are just desperate for change, and who may be the majority of Trump supporters.

I'm saddened by disparaging comments by anyone who wants to represent the US and serve all it's citizens.

 

[olivermsun]

Clinton could have chosen her words more carefully. If she mentioned 'half', rather than those who are "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic", then she's writing off many people. Clinton could have simply acknowledged those who feel that government has let them down, nobody cares about them, nobody worries about what happens to their lives and their futures, and they are just desperate for change, and who may be the majority of Trump supporters.

I'm saddened by disparaging comments by anyone who wants to represent the US and serve all it's citizens.

I agree with you there.

But it does leave us with the question: suppose it were actually true that half of Trump supporters embraced racism, sexism, etc., then would it mean that these things must be spoken about in a non-disparaging way? And if so, then how?