BrendanUnderstanding Topological Terms: Venn Diagrams and Examples

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around understanding topological concepts such as limit points, closure, and interior of sets, particularly through the use of Venn diagrams. Participants explore definitions and examples related to these concepts, while also addressing misunderstandings and clarifications in the context of topology.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Brendan seeks resources for Venn diagrams to illustrate topological terms like closure and limit points.
  • One participant argues that Venn diagrams may complicate understanding of these concepts and suggests focusing on definitions instead.
  • A participant defines a limit point of a set A = (0,1) and provides examples of limit points, noting that 0 and 1 are limit points even though they are not in A.
  • Another participant presents a scenario involving a set X defined as the intersection of two disjoint intervals, questioning the validity of the subset relationship with A = (0,1).
  • A participant challenges the definition of X, asserting that it is empty and cannot contain A, and provides corrections regarding the interior and closure of A.
  • Brendan acknowledges a misunderstanding regarding the definition of X and clarifies that X should be the real numbers, confirming the interior and closure of A as (0,1) and [0,1], respectively.
  • Brendan references a definition from their text about closure, attempting to apply it to the points 0 and 1 as limit points.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach consensus on the use of Venn diagrams for topological concepts, and there are competing views regarding the definitions and relationships between sets A and X. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the best methods for visualizing these topological terms.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the definitions and assumptions made by participants, particularly regarding the set X and its relationship to A. The discussion reflects varying interpretations of topological concepts without resolving these ambiguities.

beetle2
Messages
110
Reaction score
0
Hi Guy's
I am just starting out in topology and I was wondering if someone might know of a good link that may have venn diagrams of some important topological terms ie closure of A, int A, limit points etc.

regards
Brendan
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I can't imagine Venn diagrams as being a good way to keep those straight. They would get much too complicated. Just learn the definitions.
 
For A = (0,1). a limit point P of A is that P is a point such that every open set around it contains at least one point of A different from P.

So for this example 0 and 1 would be limits points of A although they are not in A, and there would be infinitley many limits points of A.

So if I take 0 which is not an element of A and an open set around it (0-e,0+e) the point 0+e is in A and is not equal to 0. hence a limit point
The same would be for 1.

Take 1 which is not an element of A and an open set around it (e-1,1+e) the point e-1 is in A and is not equal to 1.
 
If I have X = (- \infty,0] \cap [1,\infty +) and A \subset X = (0,1)

would A = (0,1) be the interior of A and the closure of A = X\bar{A}?
 
This makes no sense. They way you have defined X, it is the empty set- there is NO real number that is in both (-\infty, 0] and [1, +\infty), those two sets are disjoint. At first I thought you meant "\cup" rather than "\cap but the rest would still make no sense. You have defined X as "all real numbers except (0, 1) so "A\subset X= (0, 1)" is nonsense. With either cup or cap, X is NOT equal to (0, 1). If you mean A= (0, 1), then A is not a subset of X. If you meant "\cap", X is empty and has only itself as subset. If you meant \cup, A is, in fact, the complement of X.

If A is (0, 1) as a subset of the real numbers, with the usual topology, then its interior is (0, 1) (A is open) and its closure is [0, 1]. If you meant X as the underlying set with the topology inherited from the real numbers, whether you meant "\cap" or "\cup", A is not a subset of X.
 
Thanks for you reply I see where I stuffed up. I did mean...
X= R
A \subset X \mid x\in (0,1)


If A is (0, 1) as a subset of the real numbers, with the usual topology, then its interior is (0, 1) (A is open) and its closure is [0, 1].

I was confused how the closure of A was [0,1] then I re-read the definition in my text.

It says.

A point x is in the closure of A if for each neighbourhood N of x N \cap A = \emptyset


So if I take x=0 which is not an element of A and an neighbourhood N around it say (0-e,0+e) the point 0+ \eps \in A \cap N the same would be for N = (1-e,1+e) 1- \eps \in A \cap N


regards
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K