Bubble Game Collision: Calculating Deceleration

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating the deceleration of a bubble colliding with a bundle of springy bubbles that stick upon contact. It emphasizes using principles like F=ma, momentum transfer, and angular velocity to derive the deceleration, while noting that energy is not conserved in this system due to constraints preventing translation. The conversation also draws parallels to real-world scenarios, such as the effects on a free rotating plate in an explosion zone or the rotational dynamics of hovering aircraft. The aim is to ensure the physics engine in a computer game behaves realistically. Overall, the focus is on achieving a physically reasonable model for the collision dynamics.
cloa513
Messages
36
Reaction score
4
Suppose a bubble with some small mass and constant velocity hits a bundle of "bubbles"- the collision is unusual- there is no dynamic friction but the point of contact sticks- they are springy so both compress by a third before returning to their former shape. The new total bundle can't translate but can rotate. What's the deceleration? so I can F=ma and take tangential component to calculate Ft and Torque so that T=Iw.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
you'd just have to use the momentum of the first bubble then it's a transfer of momentum for a collision. As long as they don't pop (and accounting for air resistance), the bubbles are pretty much just shells, which collide about the same as spheres
 
So should I take it as
Δω=m/M*(vt/ d)
Δω change in angular velocity
m mass of bubble
M of bubble
vt tangential velocity of colliding bubble
d distance from fixing point (which may or may not the centre of the bundle).

Its my computer game- I don't understand or trust the physics engine and I'd like it to be physically reasonable.
 
That seems like it should work, you should also be able to use conservation of energy
 
Energy is not conserved for the system. It can't translate because either there is out of plane fixing device or it can induce powerful wind currents to keep it in position. A similar real world application could be a free rotating plate- its fixed to ground- it get hit with all sort of powerful particles (say its in the explosion zone of a mine) and you want to know will it spin too much and break itself. Another one is a harrier jet or helicopter hovering- how much rotation will it get if you effectively autocounteract the translation but not the rotation and will it be effective in certain conditions.
 
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top