Build a Fusor: Static Electric Field & Alt. Sides

  • Thread starter Thread starter Drakkith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Building
AI Thread Summary
Building a Fusor at home raises questions about ion containment using electric fields. A static electric field is ineffective for trapping ions, but alternating the field on different sides of the inner grid may improve containment. The idea is that rapidly switching the field could push ions closer to the grid more effectively. The concept draws parallels to a quadrupole ion trap, which utilizes oscillating AC electric fields to trap ions. Exploring this approach could lead to innovative designs for ion containment in Fusors.
Drakkith
Mentor
Messages
23,175
Reaction score
7,625
Hello all. I'm building a Fusor at home, (or at least I am trying to...) and I had a question. I know that a static electric field cannot contain ions inside it, but I was wondering if you alternate the field between different sides of the inner grid would that make any difference? The reason i was thinking this was because the ions closest to the part of the grid that has the electric field will be pushed harder than ions that are further away. If you can switch the field quick enough would that possibly contain the ions?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Cosmos2001 said:
A quadrupole ion trap, or Paul Trap, uses oscillating AC electric fields to trap ions. Perhaps it could be reshaped to geometry of the inner grid.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quadrupole_ion_trap

Thanks. I'll look into this.
 
Hello everyone, I am currently working on a burnup calculation for a fuel assembly with repeated geometric structures using MCNP6. I have defined two materials (Material 1 and Material 2) which are actually the same material but located in different positions. However, after running the calculation with the BURN card, I am encountering an issue where all burnup information(power fraction(Initial input is 1,but output file is 0), burnup, mass, etc.) for Material 2 is zero, while Material 1...
Hi everyone, I'm a complete beginner with MCNP and trying to learn how to perform burnup calculations. Right now, I'm feeling a bit lost and not sure where to start. I found the OECD-NEA Burnup Credit Calculational Criticality Benchmark (Phase I-B) and was wondering if anyone has worked through this specific benchmark using MCNP6? If so, would you be willing to share your MCNP input file for it? Seeing an actual working example would be incredibly helpful for my learning. I'd be really...
Back
Top